HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
rxi
lite
Lua2020–2024
rxi / lite

lite

A lightweight text editor written in Lua

27Distinct people
31Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
8.2KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A lightweight text editor written in Lua

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year31 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2020-04-18 15:08:30 UTC to 2024-05-07 18:22:31 UTC.

0510152020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 14 mentions; 3 submissions, 11 comments20202021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 7 mentions; 0 submissions, 7 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 1 submissions, 4 comments20222023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2024

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC14311
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC707
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC514
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303

What Hacker News says

31 sources
> is using pure software rendering (on top of SDL) in a rather naïve fashion https://github.com/rxi/lite/blob/master/src/rencache.c#L4 I think you'll find that they found the naive approach was sufficiently poor, performance wise, that additional optimizations had to be applied on-top. > But for quick hacking / porting old demos / writing emulators and also text based UI it can be fast enough. /shrug If you want to use it, use it. It's 'good enough'... > if you vastly lower your expectations
In Minimal Cross-Platform Graphics
For any graphic intensive application it would be obviously be necessary to use a GPU. But for quick hacking / porting old demos / writing emulators and also text based UI it can be fast enough. With the added benefit of small footprint, high compatibility and fast startup time. The Lite editor https://github.com/rxi/lite is using pure software rendering (on top of SDL) in a rather naïve fashion but it still renders full 32bit colors at full resolution at more than 60FPS on my computer, not the best solution but still surprisingly fast given the simplicity of the renderer. This is typically a case where simple/naïve can beat a juggernaut like Electron.
In Minimal Cross-Platform Graphics
I like the single lapce.exe and loads reasonably fast. But this is in a pre pre-alpha stage, so many bugs it's far too early for public feedback. It loads reasonably fast except chrome stats in top left then jerks towards the center. The start page says to bring up the command palette which I was unable to navigate via keyboard. The open file dialog takes an eternity to load the first time, the path is in a text box that's not editable. Focusing a text file gives an Insert cursor which is in text mode, there's a noticable slow delay before writing the first character, text selection is non existent so lacks basic text editing features. There is a built-in terminal however there's only a single tab. The only thing that gives it potential is that the folder/file browsing is super quick even with a node_modules folder so it might be built on
Read the rest
efficient rendering that can be improved. Even for such a basic editor it's 38mb download. For a far smaller + more complete editor checkout Lite: https://github.com/rxi/lite
In Lapce – Fast open-source code editor
I desperately want this. I find text editors w/ basic linting to be too limited but full IDE's like Idea or even VSCode too heavy for some devices. Something in between :(. I've given up laptop development and am forced to work with my desktop until I can afford a better laptop because Idea/VSCode runs so slowly. FWIW, I use lite (https://github.com/rxi/lite) if I need a very lightweight text editor that has rust linting (https://github.com/liquidev/lintplus) and Idea if I'm at my desktop.
In CodePerfect 95 – A fast IDE for Go
This, hundreds times this. I can't say how many years in a row I was experimenting with various GUI toolkits, libraries and concepts of an application like rxi/lite editor [0]. While I saw many good looking implementations but the very first what caught my attention was lack of any kind support to screen-reading software or problem with displaying right-click context menus. I even remember previous HN discussion when I pointed out few projects that could provide some screen-readers support [1]. Sadly, I would say 95% of all GUIs I know do not care about the accessibility. From the positive side, I am glad more and more hackers on HN focus on that matter. Also worth noting big players on the market really do take that point seriously, e.g. Flutter has a Semantics tag [2]. [0]: https://github.com/rxi/lite [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/i
Read the rest
In Gio – write immediate-mode GUI programs in Go
Thanks. Found the correct link: github.com/rxi/lite - First, it's ~20k ... which I admire in itself, but I doubt it'll have all the functionality of an advanced editor/IDE system. - Second, I don't know lua, don't have plans to learn lua. I'll take lua a teeny bit more seriously the day I don't have to decide if I need to shell out 22 pounds just to read the latest official documentation of a programming language I'm trying to learn [0] [0] https://store.feistyduck.com/products/programming-in-lua-fou...
In The values of Emacs, the Neovim revolution, and the VSCode gorilla

Showing the 15 most recent of 31 sources. Enable JavaScript to search and browse every indexed mention.

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.