SIsigil·Jul 27, 2011
How is a gateway that reads, buffers, and parses HTTP headers into an environment object [1] before turning it over to your "raw wsgi application" not protecting it from HTTP?
WSGI protects you from HTTP. CGI protects you from HTTP. mod_python and mod_perl protect you from HTTP. If you're unable to read and parse the complete HTTP request yourself -- perhaps incrementally, there's an idea -- you're protected from HTTP. Something is imposing policy like how many headers to accept, what the longest header should be, how to fold multiple headers with the same field-name, that it's okay to consume memory buffering all the headers, and so on.
In my ideal world, a web app server has access to the full HTTP request stream, calls an incremental HTTP parser [2] [3], and does whatever it wants along the way. If the typical use case is to accumulate
Read the rest
a full request object and call a handler, fine, that can be made convenient. But the web app gets to decide.
Perhaps my issue is not with frameworks (in the sense of Django, Ruby, etc), but with web servers. Except, I view the infrastructure for hosting a web app inside a web server as yet another framework. The common use case is optimized for at the expense of the less common use cases, which become more painful than they should be. Or sometimes outright impossible.
TL;DR -- Libraries over frameworks. In Soviet Framework Russia, you don't call code...code call YOU.
[1] http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0333/#environ-variables
[2] https://github.com/ry/http-parser
[3] https://github.com/mongrel/mongrel/tree/master/ext/http11