HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
ryanfleury
metadesk
C2022–2022
ryanfleury / metadesk

metadesk

Discover this repository through its Hacker News conversations.

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
396GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A public description has not been verified.

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2022-03-20 22:17:54 UTC to 2022-08-07 02:51:10 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

012022-03-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-03-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMar 142022-03-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-03-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-03-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-04-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-04-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-04-11 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-04-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-04-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-04-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-04-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-04-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-09 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-09 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-30 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsMay 232022-05-30 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-13 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-13 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-07-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-07-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-07-11 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-07-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-07-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-07-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-07-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-07-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-08-08 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsAug 1

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Mar 142022-03-14 00:00:00 UTC2022-03-21 00:00:00 UTC101
Mar 212022-03-21 00:00:00 UTC2022-03-28 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 282022-03-28 00:00:00 UTC2022-04-04 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 42022-04-04 00:00:00 UTC2022-04-11 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 112022-04-11 00:00:00 UTC2022-04-18 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 182022-04-18 00:00:00 UTC2022-04-25 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 252022-04-25 00:00:00 UTC2022-05-02 00:00:00 UTC000
May 22022-05-02 00:00:00 UTC2022-05-09 00:00:00 UTC000
May 92022-05-09 00:00:00 UTC2022-05-16 00:00:00 UTC000
May 162022-05-16 00:00:00 UTC2022-05-23 00:00:00 UTC000
May 232022-05-23 00:00:00 UTC2022-05-30 00:00:00 UTC000
May 302022-05-30 00:00:00 UTC2022-06-06 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 62022-06-06 00:00:00 UTC2022-06-13 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 132022-06-13 00:00:00 UTC2022-06-20 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 202022-06-20 00:00:00 UTC2022-06-27 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 272022-06-27 00:00:00 UTC2022-07-04 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 42022-07-04 00:00:00 UTC2022-07-11 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 112022-07-11 00:00:00 UTC2022-07-18 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 182022-07-18 00:00:00 UTC2022-07-25 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 252022-07-25 00:00:00 UTC2022-08-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 12022-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-08-08 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
https://github.com/dion-systems/metadesk seems to be the repo for their prototype. It seems like it's vaguely similar to SGML but with small but significant differences: instead of <a>blah blah</a> you say a: "blah blah", the node labels can be user data instead of just structure, attribute values are full subtrees instead of just strings, and attributes syntactically precede the node, so you say @foo(bar) baz instead of <baz foo="bar"/>.
In Ask HN: More “experimental” UIs for editing/writing code?
Off topic, but thank you for the link. There are some very good talks there. I'll give a brief summary of 3 I picked to watch. https://media.handmade-seattle.com/roc-lang/ [1], https://media.handmade-seattle.com/metadesk/ [2], https://media.handmade-seattle.com/practical-data-oriented-d... [3] 1. roc-lang by Richard Feldman. A high level pure functional language with low level language performance in runtime and compile time. Looks like the holy grail, but it seems like it'll be a few years to see if it lives up to that. 2. github.com/dion-systems/metadesk . A DSL/meta-data format that is a superset of json for that is more readable and does not encode data structure like json. 3. Some good tips on designing your data structures for efficient memory usage. I won't call it "Data Oriented Design" based on the things in the talk. The sudden
Read the rest
exponential jump in "good" code after years of plateau leave me disappointed overall. I don't see how the code can have an exponential jump in "better-ness" based on topics in the talk.
In Vimeo: “We are a B2B solution, not the indie version of YouTube.”

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.