HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
sagemath
sage
Python2014–2023
sagemath / sage

sage

Main repository of SageMath

5Distinct people
14Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
2.6KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Main repository of SageMath

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 7:24:48 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year14 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2014-07-31 12:21:37 UTC to 2023-06-01 17:37:01 UTC.

01232014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20142015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 1 submissions, 2 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments20182019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 1 submissions, 2 comments2023

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC312
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC312

What Hacker News says

2 sources
RETHINKDB: - There is a recent discussion about whether or not RethinkDB is dead here: https://github.com/rethinkdb/rethinkdb/issues/6747 - Judging by new PR's and commits, Rethinkdb development slowed down substantially in Jan 2016. SAGEMATH: - SageMath development is still very active; maybe more so, due probably to strong Europe grant support (OpenDreamKit): https://github.com/sagemath/sage/graphs/contributors SAGEMATHCLOUD: What this blog post is "really" about. - We renamed it "CoCalc" -- https://cocalc.com - I rewrote everything that depended on RethinkDB using PostgreSQL. Though it was months of work, this was obviously a VERY good decision in retrospect! - I rewrote all the realtime sync functionality to not depend on the database at all (just use a custom protocol over websockets), which is obviously a much more scalable approac
Read the rest
h to this problem. RethinkDB (and anything like it) is totally the wrong tool for implementing realtime sync for file editing. - Development on CoCalc is very active: https://github.com/sagemathinc/cocalc/graphs/contributors Disclaimer: I wrote this blog post and started Sage and CoCalc. I didn't repost this here, and just happened to notice it while scanning HN.
In RethinkDB, SageMath, Andreessen-Horowitz, Basecamp and Open Source (2016)
I started Sage, and worked on it a huge amount 2004-2012, but less so recently (due to working mostly on CoCalc). Actual contributions to and work on Sage by the community have gone UP a lot since 2012, as this plot (https://github.com/sagemath/sage/graphs/contributors) at Github shows. Much of that work is from research mathematicians that are adding large swaths of important functionality (e.g., in differential manifolds) to Sage. But there's also a very welcome push for quality, e.g., the number one recent contributor, fchapoton, has been fixing every little detail in the codebase revealed by https://lgtm.com/ and other tools, and there's also been a lot of work to fully transition Sage to Python 3 (which is difficult since so much is written in Cython and make nontrivial use of comparisons). I would have likely made Sage pip-in
Read the rest
stallable from day 1 if I had known that pip would turn out to be so popular. It was really unclear what was going on with Python packaging 15 years ago. I'm really glad that one package manager (pip) has become so good at this point.
In Make Sagelib a pip-installable Python source package, listed on PyPI (2016)

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.