HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
sandboxie-plus
Sandboxie
C++2020–2026
sandboxie-plus / Sandboxie

Sandboxie

Sandboxie Plus & Classic

13Distinct people
13Mentions
1Explicit recommenders
19.9KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Sandboxie Plus & Classic

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

> Unpopular opinion perhaps, but I think desktop operating systems need to start including robust sandboxing and permission systems that are turned on by default. Very much…

itvision used a recommendation phrase. One indexed comment matches. This is a phrase match, not a verdict.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year13 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2020-07-12 08:08:05 UTC to 2026-10-09 13:44:35 UTC.

012342020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments20202021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 0 submissions, 4 comments20232024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC211
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC211
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC211
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC404
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

13 sources
Just to add a bit of history--there was a little known software product, a name which I cannot remember or find, in the early 2000s for Windows NT based operating systems, which hooked API calls of Windows applications to implement seccomp-like filtering for random Windows applications. I recall it allowed users to restrict an application to not perform certain system actions, access certain folders/files, etc. It was well ahead of its time for early 2000s operating system hardening and I think may have been an inspiration arising from early 2000s rootkits. It predated https://github.com/sandboxie-plus/Sandboxie but Sandboxie is an example (from 2004) of a similar project that has a longer development history. There have been other similar projects that have come and gone over the years too.
In Microsoft rewarded for security failures with another US Government contract
My point is that if it's just Tor Browser without Tor, then there's functionally no reason to have that build be incompatible with Windows 7. Unless they deliberately coded it in like if OS=Win7/Win8 ; then Crash ; else Run Which would be a dick move, especially because Firefox, on which Tor Browser and Mullvad Browser are based, still supports Windows 7. --------- Now to your point. It is absolutely possible to run Windows 7 reasonably securely. Well..., depends on your usecase. But the way in which I keep it secure might be a little cumbersome to some. My router runs PFSense with Suricata, and I encrypt my DNS traffic. I run a combination of Peerblock(while no longer maintained, it works splendidly in whitelist mode)[1], and Simplewall Firewall[2]. I run a combination of uMatrix(which again, while no longer maintained, it works gre
Read the rest
at in whitelist mode)[3], and NoScript[4] on my Firefox web browser which I run inside Sandboxie[5]. There are also various services that are insecure and must be turned off - UPnP, Print Spooler, RDP etc. I run mostly FOSS software. The few proprietary closed source software(Games, Sublime Text) that I do run, I run them in SandBoxie or QEMU. Here are my reasons for not upgrading: I've modified my `UXTheme.dll` to significantly change my "Desktop Environment" to suit my workflow, and I've heard from people I know to be credible, that latter Windows versions(8 onwards) break system UI modifications when they update, and they don't work quite as well afterward. My modified Win7 UI is way too important to my workflow. Python have stopped releasing binaries for Win7 after 3.8.10[6] but I'm okay with it. If I do need the newer Python versions for something, I'll just use my Linux Desktop or run Linux in a virtual machine for a Python quickie. Windows 7 is extremely stable. While not as stable as Linux, I often have uptimes of over 350 days, before a BSOD, by which point I can foresee a crash coming and reboot. To lean into your metaphor, Microsoft is now shipping operating systems with "open windows" everywhere(way more open windows than my "insecure" Windows 7 has), and we, as users, are having to rebuild the ISOs they release, to make them more "privacy friendly"(yes I'm aware of the difference between privacy and security but they're really interchangeable here), and even then, we're having to use 3rd party "de-bloaters" and Batch/Powershell scripts off of Github, just so the majority of those proverbial windows are closed back up again. This really shouldn't have to be the case, but it is. Microsoft have decided that they would rather their bread be buttered by advertisers than by the actual users of their software. With Windows 7, I know there's an open window that I can't shut, but I have an electrified fence surrounding my compound, with security cameras and loaded turrets pointed towards that open window and other open windows in my house. I know where Windows 7's security limitations are, and I can mitigate against that, elsewhere. But I will admit, I don't go around recommending laypeople to use Windows 7 though, as the barrier to securing it is high. Even after securing it, the user has to be careful. In my humble opinion, Windows 7 was the last true Microsoft Operating System. It simply does what is asked of it, and moves out of the way. All Microsoft need have done was support Powershell, DirectX, give Win7 a "security updates as a service" business model(which I would've gladly paid for), and make WSL for it(Cygwin is excellent but WSL would be nicer). I know there is 0Patch, a 3rd party company who sell security updates for Windows 7, but I would've appreciated official Microsoft security updates. I would switch to Linux, if there was a robust equivalent to Autohotkey on Linux, and the games I want to run, worked on it. So yeah, I still run Windows 7. I can't see myself ever upgrading to another Microsoft OS, ever again. And I am, and I cannot emphasize this enough, exceedingly happy with it. [1] https://www.peerblock.com/ [2] https://github.com/henrypp/simplewall [3] https://github.com/gorhill/uMatrix [4] https://noscript.net [5] https://github.com/sandboxie-plus/Sandboxie
In The Mullvad Browser
itvision·Apr 5, 2021Recommendation phrase
> Unpopular opinion perhaps, but I think desktop operating systems need to start including robust sandboxing and permission systems that are turned on by default. Very much welcomed but both Windows and Linux were not created with this idea in mind and it entails quite an overhead. Under Windows I love using SandBoxie: https://github.com/sandboxie-plus/Sandboxie/issues Under Linux I use firejail but it's 100% user unfriendly ;-)
In Linux Myths Series: Linux Doesn't Need an Antivirus (2020)

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.