HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
sass
sass
TypeScript2011–2021
sass / sass

sass

Sass makes CSS fun!

11Distinct people
11Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
15.4KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Sass makes CSS fun!

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year11 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2011-12-04 21:19:19 UTC to 2021-06-25 09:26:26 UTC.

01232011-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20112012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 1 submissions, 2 comments2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 1 submissions, 2 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20162017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2021

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20112011-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20122012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20132013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC312
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC312
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110

What Hacker News says

11 sources
It's true. sassc(1) is a great step forward in terms of speed. That said, Sass encourages practices that I consider bad. Nesting, @extend, etc. Sass's design also makes it difficult to implement a basic feature like grouping all media queries for a single output. Check this issue from 2011: https://github.com/sass/sass/issues/116 If you don't mind a bigger tool and the dependency on Node.js, then PostCSS looks very good: https://github.com/postcss/postcss
In Show HN: Hasp – A minimal CSS preprocessor using the M4 macro language

Ask HN: Is SASS development stagnating?

I fell in love with SCSS on first sight and it has greatly helped me improve my front-end programming. From time to time I think of features that could make it even better. However, when I went to propose them I found that they are already proposed, like optional imports [1] and importing .css files (besides .scss) [2]. Some are closed, even though they are still planned for some point in the future. While I understand that it's a large project and it should be not easy to manage it, the date is from 2011 and 2013. Further investigation[3] shows that from 2007-2011, the top contributor Natalie Weizenbaum (nex3) was really active (~4k commits) in the site but now she seems to work for Google[4] on Dart. The 2nd biggest contributor made ~494 commits, or 10%. Third one made 40 or 1%. As a SCSS developer myself [5] I am interested in seeing S
Read the rest
ASS advance. I am of course not saying this in a negative tone, I am unable to contribute myself with ruby. I tried to contribute with some issues but as mentioned they are already filled. Is SASS development stagnating? If so, what can we do to help it keep going? (for ruby but also non-ruby developers) [1] https://github.com/sass/sass/issues/779 [2] https://github.com/sass/sass/issues/193 [3] https://github.com/sass/sass/graphs/contributors [4] https://twitter.com/nex3 [5] https://github.com/picnicss/picnic
2 points · Open discussion
I'm helping build Sourcegraph, which lists the gems that depend on FFI here: https://sourcegraph.com/github.com/ffi/ffi/network/repos/in and can show where some of its main methods are used: https://sourcegraph.com/github.com/ffi/ffi/symbols/ruby/gem/... and also for some other gems: https://sourcegraph.com/github.com/nex3/sass/network/repos/i... https://sourcegraph.com/github.com/lsegal/yard/network/repos... https://sourcegraph.com/github.com/rails/rails/network/repos... It would be great if someone added this functionality to rubygems.org (npmjs.org has it: https://npmjs.org/browse/depended/request). The Ruby support is very alpha right now. It works for some (but not all) popular gems, and it doesn't show transitive dependencies yet. Also, the list of dependents isn't comprehensive, but it should be a good starting point. If there are
Read the rest
any specific gems you'd like to see dependents for, or any issues you see, let me know.
In Ruby-FFI is no longer maintained
In our current project instead of putting the framework's html/css into our codebase I'm outputting as bare bones html as I can with semantic class names on everything and then mapping those classes to the framework using sass mixins/extends/includes. To make a RWD site I'm having to rewrite a lot of the framework to be mixins instead of classes so that I can use them in @media as SASS doesn't allow @extend in @media any more[1]. What I'd find really useful would be a framework thats entirely built from mixins/partials and outputs no css until you create your own classes that use them. [1]: https://github.com/nex3/sass/issues/154 Disallow @extend within directives
In Groundwork - A Responsive HTML5, CSS and JavaScript Framework

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.