HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
savannah-i-g
TSUKUYOMI
AI & Machine Learning2025–2025
savannah-i-g / TSUKUYOMI

TSUKUYOMI

##Note: this is really old now, and the janky pseudo methods are probably only working out of sheer coincidence. This was an early experiment in how jargon & combinations of artificial weights in pseudocode can influence LLM behaviour without retraining. This was probably ahead of its time

2Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
95GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

##Note: this is really old now, and the janky pseudo methods are probably only working out of sheer coincidence. This was an early experiment in how jargon & combinations of artificial weights in pseudocode can influence LLM behaviour without retraining. This was probably ahead of its time

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2025-06-04 14:20:44 UTC to 2025-06-05 09:43:00 UTC.

0122025-06-04 14:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-04 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsJun 4, 14:002025-06-04 15:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-04 16:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-04 16:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-04 17:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-04 17:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-04 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-04 18:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-04 19:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-04 19:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-04 20:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-04 20:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-04 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-04 21:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-04 22:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-04 22:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-04 23:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-04 23:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJun 4, 23:002025-06-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-05 01:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-05 01:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-05 02:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-05 02:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-05 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-05 03:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-05 04:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-05 04:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-05 05:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-05 05:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-05 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-05 06:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-05 07:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-05 07:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-05 08:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-05 08:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-05 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-05 09:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-05 10:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 commentsJun 5, 09:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jun 4, 14:002025-06-04 14:00:00 UTC2025-06-04 15:00:00 UTC110
Jun 4, 15:002025-06-04 15:00:00 UTC2025-06-04 16:00:00 UTC000
Jun 4, 16:002025-06-04 16:00:00 UTC2025-06-04 17:00:00 UTC000
Jun 4, 17:002025-06-04 17:00:00 UTC2025-06-04 18:00:00 UTC000
Jun 4, 18:002025-06-04 18:00:00 UTC2025-06-04 19:00:00 UTC000
Jun 4, 19:002025-06-04 19:00:00 UTC2025-06-04 20:00:00 UTC000
Jun 4, 20:002025-06-04 20:00:00 UTC2025-06-04 21:00:00 UTC000
Jun 4, 21:002025-06-04 21:00:00 UTC2025-06-04 22:00:00 UTC000
Jun 4, 22:002025-06-04 22:00:00 UTC2025-06-04 23:00:00 UTC000
Jun 4, 23:002025-06-04 23:00:00 UTC2025-06-05 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 5, 00:002025-06-05 00:00:00 UTC2025-06-05 01:00:00 UTC000
Jun 5, 01:002025-06-05 01:00:00 UTC2025-06-05 02:00:00 UTC000
Jun 5, 02:002025-06-05 02:00:00 UTC2025-06-05 03:00:00 UTC000
Jun 5, 03:002025-06-05 03:00:00 UTC2025-06-05 04:00:00 UTC000
Jun 5, 04:002025-06-05 04:00:00 UTC2025-06-05 05:00:00 UTC000
Jun 5, 05:002025-06-05 05:00:00 UTC2025-06-05 06:00:00 UTC000
Jun 5, 06:002025-06-05 06:00:00 UTC2025-06-05 07:00:00 UTC000
Jun 5, 07:002025-06-05 07:00:00 UTC2025-06-05 08:00:00 UTC000
Jun 5, 08:002025-06-05 08:00:00 UTC2025-06-05 09:00:00 UTC000
Jun 5, 09:002025-06-05 09:00:00 UTC2025-06-05 10:00:00 UTC211

What Hacker News says

3 sources
TSUKUYOMI - Modular Intelligence Analysis Framework (40+ modules for structured analysis) I've been working on TSUKUYOMI, a modular framework that implements intelligence community analytical standards in AI systems. It's essentially a collection of 40+ specialized modules that can be orchestrated to perform structured analysis on complex data. GitHub: https://github.com/ShimazuSystems/TSUKUYOMI/ What it does Instead of relying on black-box AI responses, TSUKUYOMI enforces structured analytical methodologies: - Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) - Systematically evaluates multiple explanations - Source reliability scoring - A-F reliability, 1-6 credibility (IC standards) - Multi-source correlation - Temporal, spatial, semantic, network analysis - Confidence quantification - Bayesian fusion with uncertainty propagation Technical approa
Read the rest
ch modules/ ├── data_recognition_ingestion.tsukuyomi # Multi-INT data processing ├── correlation_analysis.tsukuyomi # Cross-source validation ├── strategic_scenario_modeling.tsukuyomi # Probabilistic forecasting ├── flight_data_analysis.tsukuyomi # ADS-B/MLAT processing └── web_search_osint.tsukuyomi # OSINT collection Each module follows a structured execution sequence with explicit reasoning chains. The orchestration core dynamically selects and chains modules based on requirements. Example: OSINT Analysis { "execution_sequence": [ { "operation": "Source Reliability Assessment", "actions": ["evaluate_source_access", "check_corroboration", "assign_confidence"], "output": "//SOURCE: Reliability B / Credibility 2" }, { "operation": "Entity Extraction", "actions": ["identify_persons", "map_relationships", "extract_technical_indicators"], "output": "//RESULT: 15 entities identified with confidence scores" } ] } Why I built this Current AI systems are great at pattern matching but poor at structured reasoning. In intelligence analysis, you need: - Explicit evidence chains - Alternative hypothesis consideration - Quantified uncertainty - Source attribution - Audit trails TSUKUYOMI provides these through modular components that enforce analytical rigor. Current implementation - Runs in Claude AI environment (upload the .tsukuyomi files) - Modules are JSON-based configurations defining analytical workflows - Includes specialized processors for HUMINT, SIGINT, GEOINT, OSINT, CYBINT - Outputs professional intelligence products with proper confidence levels Interesting technical bits 1. Multi-source information fusion (MSIF) at three levels: data, feature, and decision 2. Bayesian confidence integration across heterogeneous sources 3. Dynamic module orchestration based on information requirements 4. Classification-aware processing (handles UNCLASSIFIED through TOP SECRET) Use cases beyond intelligence - Research: Systematic literature review with source credibility scoring - Business: Competitive analysis with structured methodology - Engineering: Failure analysis using ACH framework - Security: Threat correlation across multiple data sources Future development - Standalone Python implementation - REST API for integration - Custom module development SDK - Visualization components for link analysis Looking for feedback on: 1. The module architecture approach 2. Other domains where structured analysis would be valuable 3. Integration ideas with existing analytical workflows The code is MIT licensed. Contributions welcome, especially domain-specific modules.
In Tsukuyomi – Modular AI Intelligence Analysis Framework

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.