HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
sctplab
usrsctp
C2016–2022
sctplab / usrsctp

usrsctp

A portable SCTP userland stack

4Distinct people
4Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
765GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A portable SCTP userland stack

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year4 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2016-04-11 10:48:25 UTC to 2022-02-01 15:01:16 UTC.

012016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments20162017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20192020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2022

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110

What Hacker News says

4 sources
j1elo·Feb 1, 2022Submission

Ask HN: GitHub Download Hash Change?

Today, an issue was raised in one project I use, because their build system rejected an invalid sha256sum while downloading a dependency from a GitHub zip file. The offending dependency is usrsctp (https://github.com/sctplab/usrsctp) at commit 9d6b99b: https://github.com/sctplab/usrsctp/archive/9d6b99b10a70f7a63d21cd80d03c353da9ac19d… This file's sha256sum has always been d9b7b3350ea0be2a3d1437e404d4852df741c4984b734729c5edc337ff4b7611 but suddenly today it changed to e86fe0b8aabef0eae207a94a5525da303e90477c37fce272c84e2d87d7ac169b This lasted a couple hours, and it is now back to the original hash. Does this mean that the project might have been compromised somehow? Or are there any other less alarming explanations for what has happened?
13 points · Open discussion
I am sure there are even more implementations that I am not aware of. * https://github.com/pion/sctp * https://github.com/aiortc/aiortc/blob/main/src/aiortc/rtcsct... * https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/main:thi... * https://github.com/sctplab/usrsctp People don't make these decisions for technical reasons only. Career wise it is a bad choice to spend your time working on pre-existing technologies. You don't become a distinguished engineer by iterating on existing technologies. You become one by being the creator of something new. I think QUIC is great and does a good job solving the problems it was designed to solve. It is disingenuous to pretend these decisions were made only for technical reasons.
In QUIC is now RFC 9000
SCTP can't go through NAT (there is ietf draft in works for that). But SCTP already exist in your favorite browser Chrome, Firefox both use usrsctplib (https://github.com/sctplab/usrsctp) to provide sctp over udp for webrtc signaling. But there also need to be sctp over udp over dtls (or just sctp over dtls) happen as you can't use TLS with SCTP unordered mode or multihoming. SCTP slowly gain traction in userspace besides being only in mobile operator networks (lte)
In The web sucks if you have a slow connection

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.