HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
SeanDaBlack
KelloggBot
TeX2021–2021
SeanDaBlack / KelloggBot

KelloggBot

Kellogg bad | Union good | Support strike funds

5Distinct people
6Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
385GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Kellogg bad | Union good | Support strike funds

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:03:16 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour6 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2021-12-10 15:58:00 UTC to 2021-12-10 18:34:53 UTC.

01232021-12-10 15:00:00 UTC to 2021-12-10 16:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsDec 10, 15:002021-12-10 16:00:00 UTC to 2021-12-10 17:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsDec 10, 16:002021-12-10 17:00:00 UTC to 2021-12-10 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2021-12-10 18:00:00 UTC to 2021-12-10 19:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsDec 10, 18:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Dec 10, 15:002021-12-10 15:00:00 UTC2021-12-10 16:00:00 UTC101
Dec 10, 16:002021-12-10 16:00:00 UTC2021-12-10 17:00:00 UTC101
Dec 10, 17:002021-12-10 17:00:00 UTC2021-12-10 18:00:00 UTC303
Dec 10, 18:002021-12-10 18:00:00 UTC2021-12-10 19:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

6 sources
It looks like this script is using the standard Faker module email generation, which will generate email addresses exclusively with domains at example.net, example.com, and example.org. It also attaches the exact same .png [0] for the resume in every fake application. So these should be pretty easily filterable based on those 2 facts alone. Additionally, there are plenty of red flags that any human reviewer would quickly pick up with these applications. The addresses don't exist. The random prior occupations it submits are rarely in line with what you'd expect for these positions. The name generator is pulling random first names for the last name as well. And the randomly generated email addresses contain names that don't match the name on application. So, the script will submit an application for "Susan Justin," a former Surgeon with th
Read the rest
e email address ronaldbrewer@example.com, at an address that doesn't exist. I'm sure this is a nuisance for the HR analyst who's the first line of defense in reviewing applications. And they might've had to bring in someone with more technical/fraud skills to help weed out the fake applications, but it seems quite manageable. [0] https://github.com/SeanDaBlack/KelloggBot/blob/main/src/resu...
In Code to flood Kellogg with bogus job applications after strikers sacked
> Can you be more clear on this? I don't see where this is happening. There's a start_drive function that they call once in main and use that reference the entire time. https://github.com/SeanDaBlack/KelloggBot/blob/main/req.py#L... They run start_driver() inside a while loop with 10000 iterations > How else would you get around navigating the DOM which this has to match precisely? For that specific one I'd probably try "//*[contains(text(), 'Apply now')]", if they add a single element to that page the entire xpath will fail in the code example > Very subjective? Do you have two first names? > Agree with this but maybe it's not possible for some reason in regards to how the webpage is configured? Maybe! Still, I bet you it's possible to wait for an element even if it's your own action taking effect.
In Code to flood Kellogg with bogus job applications after strikers sacked
- Opening and closing the driver 10000 times Can you be more clear on this? I don't see where this is happening. There's a start_drive function that they call once in main and use that reference the entire time. https://github.com/SeanDaBlack/KelloggBot/blob/main/req.py#L... - Complicated flakey in-line xpaths '//*[@id="content"]/div/div[2]/div/div[1]/div[1]/div/div/button' How else would you get around navigating the DOM which this has to match precisely? - case first_name | last_name both uses a first_name() generator, should just be generate_name() Very subjective? - Time.sleep(x) is flakey, you should wait for the element to appear. Agree with this but maybe it's not possible for some reason in regards to how the webpage is configured?
In Code to flood Kellogg with bogus job applications after strikers sacked

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.