HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
senchalabs
connect
JavaScript2010–2017
senchalabs / connect

connect

Connect is an extensible HTTP server framework for node using "plugins" known as middleware.

9Distinct people
9Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
9.9KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Connect is an extensible HTTP server framework for node using "plugins" known as middleware.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:03:16 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year9 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2010-07-30 04:09:13 UTC to 2017-06-20 12:59:51 UTC.

01232010-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments20102011-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20132014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2017

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20102010-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2011-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20112011-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20122012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20132013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

9 sources
While this looks stellar and having a serializable format is cool too, I am personally not a fan of gigantic configuration files as this. Being declarative is much better than being imperative and configuration files seem like a natural fit for a declarative system, but they lack expressiveness. They are hard to make generic and lend themselves to repetition and fragility (in my experience). I'd say that composition wins over configuration. If you provide a domain specific language with a set of useful primitives, users can leverage it to describe what they want with more flexibility and freedom. For concrete examples within js-land, look at gulp.js[1], connect[2]-style middleware, and JSX[3]. All of them describe their structure with code, in a composable, pluggable, reusable fashion. That being said, with a robust enough representation
Read the rest
like Vega's, I bet you could write code that dynamically builds the final JSON structure. [1]: http://gulpjs.com/ [2]: https://github.com/senchalabs/connect. [3]: https://facebook.github.io/jsx/
In Vega: A Visualization Grammar
Here's a few sources I really liked: * Express - https://github.com/visionmedia/express - I don't like TJ's coding style, and general trolling of CoffeeScript, but this is a really great, clean and tiny codebase. (As well as all the connect middlewares - https://github.com/senchalabs/connect) * Async - https://github.com/caolan/async - is very readable. Async is a great library for async ops handling in JS, and it's really neat seeing the implementation patterns. * Ray - is a games DSL in Ruby - https://github.com/Mon-Ouie/ray - I love it, and it's a great read especially if you are interested in DSLs as much as I do. * Jekyll - https://github.com/mojombo/jekyll - really helped me going forward with my ruby skills. It's nice, clean, commented, not too big, and useful. * Redis - https://github.com/antirez/redis - lots of data structure imp
Read the rest
lementations. Antirez just writes C so nicely. anet.c has networking, TCP bits, ae.c is an event loop. Lots of great code there.
In Reading Other People's Code
Agreed. I came here to post basically the same line. >without ... trying to create some other application on top of Meteor to sell I hope I dont see millions of dollars of time spent on abstraction and magic, or losing sight of a scientific process or an ability to correct fundamental architectural flaws that would challenge or invalidate the need for or the existence of what is now meteor, just because there has been introduced a fiduciary duty. Introspection on the fundamental usefulness and proper use cases in comparison to competition or existing equivalents is an ongoing dialogue that would be unprofessional to dismiss. Meteor is for everything? I really doubt that. Dont think about proper tools for the job, dont think about how to really scale out javascript architecture or solve that problem without subjectivity, dont think simplic
Read the rest
ity, just think meteor? Marketing like this seems out of place in open source -- especially javascript frameworks -- which in proper form is most functional as a meritocracy. Along this continuum we will see meteor probably fitting right in at oscon, and maybe thats where they want to be, because it seems like its just going to be enterprise software with a hipster twist, donning open source as an applause light. >Meteor was also a stealth participant in the S11 cycle of Y Combinator. Sorry to be more cynical than everyone else in this comment thread, meteor guys, but I had red flags going up about meteor the first time it was posted on HN and I saw testimonials for a javascript framework that wasnt even production ready. This is an open source javascript web framework: https://github.com/meteor/meteor/blob/master/app/server/serv... https://github.com/senchalabs/connect#authors
In Meteor Raises $11.2M from Andreessen Horowitz
Unfortunately, this is like comparing apples and oranges. Express provides more robust routing, content negotiation, view rendering and partial support, environment based configuration, etc, etc. I presume if kick.js eventually achieves feature parity with Express, kick.js will incur a performance penalty as much, if not more, than Express. A more fair comparison could be made between kick.js and something lower-level such as connect (https://github.com/senchalabs/connect). Or better yet, between kick.js and a "raw" node http server. Also, the name is somewhat taken: https://github.com/mortennobel/KickJS/
In NodeJS HTTP Framework claimed as speeder than Express JS

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.