HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
Sendhub
shipbuilder
Go2013–2013
Sendhub / shipbuilder

shipbuilder

The Open-source self-hosted Platform-as-a-Service written in Go

4Distinct people
13Mentions
1Explicit recommenders
15GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

The Open-source self-hosted Platform-as-a-Service written in Go

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

This looks incredibly useful! In the repo (github.com/sendhub/shipbuilder) I see that it is written in go-lang -- which is quickly becoming my favorite programming language. It…

consciousness used a recommendation phrase. One indexed comment matches. This is a phrase match, not a verdict.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 1:49:46 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week13 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2013-08-06 19:00:32 UTC to 2013-10-04 19:43:03 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

0123452013-08-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-08-12 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 1 submissions, 4 commentsAug 52013-08-12 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-08-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-08-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-08-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2013-08-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-09-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 1 submissions, 3 comments2013-09-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-09-09 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsSep 22013-09-09 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-09-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2013-09-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-09-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-09-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-09-30 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-09-30 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-10-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 commentsSep 30

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Aug 52013-08-05 00:00:00 UTC2013-08-12 00:00:00 UTC514
Aug 122013-08-12 00:00:00 UTC2013-08-19 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 192013-08-19 00:00:00 UTC2013-08-26 00:00:00 UTC101
Aug 262013-08-26 00:00:00 UTC2013-09-02 00:00:00 UTC413
Sep 22013-09-02 00:00:00 UTC2013-09-09 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 92013-09-09 00:00:00 UTC2013-09-16 00:00:00 UTC101
Sep 162013-09-16 00:00:00 UTC2013-09-23 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 232013-09-23 00:00:00 UTC2013-09-30 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 302013-09-30 00:00:00 UTC2013-10-07 00:00:00 UTC202

What Hacker News says

13 sources
I also found myself asking this same question, and after careful consideration I ended up choosing LXC over Docker, and here are some reasons why: - LXC works fine on it's own. - Docker has it's own bugs, so you get all of the Docker bugs in addition to potential LXC bugs. - IPTables routing for containers to the outside world isn't that hard to manage. - LXC is simple and straightforward, and by comparison Docker is a convoluted confusing mess of additional layers of complexity. - LXC is already used in many real-world applications for operational software everyday. If you want to know anything else about real-world usage of LXC, please feel free to contact me (jay at jaytaylor com), or check out my relevant project: ShipBuilder [1]. [1] https://github.com/sendhub/shipbuilder
In How is Docker.io different from a normal virtual machine?
I've been keeping an eye on the ShipBuilder PAAS project - the minimalist Heroku clone written in Go. It is starting to look quite promising. Quoting jaytaylor's comment [1] from below: > You may be interested in checking out ShipBuilder - it > is an open-source Heroku-clone PaaS. > > ShipBuilder is written in Go, and uses Git, LXC and > HAProxy to deliver a complete solution for > an application platform-as-a-service. > > http://shipbuilder.io [2] > > https://github.com/sendhub/shipbuilder [3] [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6292463 [2] http://shipbuilder.io [3] https://github.com/sendhub/shipbuilder
In Docker: Git for deployment
When we first began creating ShipBuilder several months ago, Docker was too unstable to develop against. We then looked at using bare LXC instead and realized it was very straightforward (basically as simple as: lxc-clone, lxc-start, lxc-stop, and lxc-destroy). In fact, most of the LXC functionality is encapsulated in this 50-line file: https://github.com/Sendhub/shipbuilder/blob/master/src/execu... I am certainly open to the possibility of adding docker compatibility, especially in the form of a pull-request ;)
In ShipBuilder - Open Source PaaS written in Go
consciousness·Aug 8, 2013Recommendation phrase
This looks incredibly useful! In the repo (github.com/sendhub/shipbuilder) I see that it is written in go-lang -- which is quickly becoming my favorite programming language. It also uses HAProxy, which I've used many times in the past and it is easily the most powerful software load-balancer in existence. What a potent combination of technology...will definitely be keeping an eye or two on this!
In ShipBuilder: Go make your deployments smooth sailing

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.