ai-server

h can be used as long as the OSS software that uses it is publicly available. The goal of these additional grants and exemptions is to make it as easy as possible to be used with OSS Software that remains OSS. Users who don't want to publicly share their changes don't have to use the commercial binary packages, they can still create their own builds and maintain their hidden OSS code-base internally under the AGPL which does at least require them to make their fork available to their users who run their software. With that said I don't see how software that's delivered in Docker appliances like this benefits anyone to adopt a non-copyleft OSS license. What OSS sofware a Docker container runs doesn't have any practical implications for anyone using it. All a non-copyleft license would do is encourage closed source derivatives, proprietary forks and pay-walled versions to the detriment of all other users and prevent other forks from being able to freely use and share their improvements. [1] https://github.com/ServiceStack/ai-server/blob/main/license.... [2] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.html [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyleft