HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
sheetal57
doppelganger-finder
Python2014–2014
sheetal57 / doppelganger-finder

doppelganger-finder

Doppelganger-finder finds multiple accounts (doppelgangers) of a user.

2Distinct people
4Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
37GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Doppelganger-finder finds multiple accounts (doppelgangers) of a user.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by 3-hour interval4 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2014-07-09 12:19:49 UTC to 2014-07-11 11:47:18 UTC.

0122014-07-09 12:00:00 UTC to 2014-07-09 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsJul 9, 12:002014-07-09 15:00:00 UTC to 2014-07-09 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-07-09 18:00:00 UTC to 2014-07-09 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-07-09 21:00:00 UTC to 2014-07-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2014-07-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-07-10 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-07-10 03:00:00 UTC to 2014-07-10 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-07-10 06:00:00 UTC to 2014-07-10 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-07-10 09:00:00 UTC to 2014-07-10 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJul 10, 09:002014-07-10 12:00:00 UTC to 2014-07-10 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-07-10 15:00:00 UTC to 2014-07-10 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-07-10 18:00:00 UTC to 2014-07-10 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-07-10 21:00:00 UTC to 2014-07-11 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-07-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-07-11 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-07-11 03:00:00 UTC to 2014-07-11 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-07-11 06:00:00 UTC to 2014-07-11 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-07-11 09:00:00 UTC to 2014-07-11 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJul 11, 09:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jul 9, 12:002014-07-09 12:00:00 UTC2014-07-09 15:00:00 UTC110
Jul 9, 15:002014-07-09 15:00:00 UTC2014-07-09 18:00:00 UTC000
Jul 9, 18:002014-07-09 18:00:00 UTC2014-07-09 21:00:00 UTC000
Jul 9, 21:002014-07-09 21:00:00 UTC2014-07-10 00:00:00 UTC202
Jul 10, 00:002014-07-10 00:00:00 UTC2014-07-10 03:00:00 UTC000
Jul 10, 03:002014-07-10 03:00:00 UTC2014-07-10 06:00:00 UTC000
Jul 10, 06:002014-07-10 06:00:00 UTC2014-07-10 09:00:00 UTC000
Jul 10, 09:002014-07-10 09:00:00 UTC2014-07-10 12:00:00 UTC000
Jul 10, 12:002014-07-10 12:00:00 UTC2014-07-10 15:00:00 UTC000
Jul 10, 15:002014-07-10 15:00:00 UTC2014-07-10 18:00:00 UTC000
Jul 10, 18:002014-07-10 18:00:00 UTC2014-07-10 21:00:00 UTC000
Jul 10, 21:002014-07-10 21:00:00 UTC2014-07-11 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 11, 00:002014-07-11 00:00:00 UTC2014-07-11 03:00:00 UTC000
Jul 11, 03:002014-07-11 03:00:00 UTC2014-07-11 06:00:00 UTC000
Jul 11, 06:002014-07-11 06:00:00 UTC2014-07-11 09:00:00 UTC000
Jul 11, 09:002014-07-11 09:00:00 UTC2014-07-11 12:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

4 sources
It seems safe to assume most "known" ring detection systems being used are private/secret since their goal is to prevent abuse and revealing their details might thwart their effectiveness. None the less, at least some ring detection work is being done publicly, and I've recently been trying to learn more about the methods being used. The following should be helpful to anyone who has to fight this sort of abuse: "Doppelganger Finder: Taking Stylometry To The Underground" https://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~sa499/papers/oakland2014-unde... Code: Find multiple accounts (doppelgangers) of a user https://github.com/sheetal57/doppelganger-finder https://psal.cs.drexel.edu/index.php/JStylo-Anonymouth https://github.com/psal/jstylo
In Retraction of 60 articles implicated in a peer review and citation ring

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.