HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
shurcooL-legacy
Conception
C++2013–2016
shurcooL-legacy / Conception

Conception

Conception was an experimental project, looking for ways to make software development more efficient.

4Distinct people
15Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
529GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Conception was an experimental project, looking for ways to make software development more efficient.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 9:28:18 AM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year15 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2013-01-29 19:47:54 UTC to 2016-08-18 03:05:23 UTC.

0369122013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 11 mentions; 0 submissions, 11 comments20132014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments20142015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2016

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20132013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC11011
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
It's cool to see more people thinking about and experimenting with this stuff. I've done a similar attempt with my Conception project, https://github.com/shurcooL/Conception#demonstration One reason "all code editors look the same" is because they're really mostly "text editors" with some coding-functionality on top. And as tikhonj explains, they display text prominently like image editors display images. I used to think writing code as text was an inefficient legacy decision and that moving up to working with higher level concepts would be a big improvement, since we usually think about code at a higher level than an ascii-character-at-a-time. However, the limiting factor is the input hardware we use to interact with computers. The most efficient input device is a keyboard, and text is most efficient to manipulate with a keyboard.
In Why do all code editors look the same?

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.