HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
simonw
google-drive-to-sqlite
Python2022–2022
simonw / google-drive-to-sqlite

google-drive-to-sqlite

Create a SQLite database containing metadata from Google Drive

4Distinct people
5Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
164GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Create a SQLite database containing metadata from Google Drive

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 1:49:46 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by 6-hour interval5 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2022-02-21 08:41:04 UTC to 2022-02-25 18:31:22 UTC.

01232022-02-21 06:00:00 UTC to 2022-02-21 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsFeb 21, 06:002022-02-21 12:00:00 UTC to 2022-02-21 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 1 submissions, 2 comments2022-02-21 18:00:00 UTC to 2022-02-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-02-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-02-22 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-02-22 06:00:00 UTC to 2022-02-22 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-02-22 12:00:00 UTC to 2022-02-22 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-02-22 18:00:00 UTC to 2022-02-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-02-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-02-23 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-02-23 06:00:00 UTC to 2022-02-23 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-02-23 12:00:00 UTC to 2022-02-23 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsFeb 23, 12:002022-02-23 18:00:00 UTC to 2022-02-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-02-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-02-24 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-02-24 06:00:00 UTC to 2022-02-24 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-02-24 12:00:00 UTC to 2022-02-24 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-02-24 18:00:00 UTC to 2022-02-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-02-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-02-25 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-02-25 06:00:00 UTC to 2022-02-25 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-02-25 12:00:00 UTC to 2022-02-25 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-02-25 18:00:00 UTC to 2022-02-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsFeb 25, 18:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Feb 21, 06:002022-02-21 06:00:00 UTC2022-02-21 12:00:00 UTC110
Feb 21, 12:002022-02-21 12:00:00 UTC2022-02-21 18:00:00 UTC312
Feb 21, 18:002022-02-21 18:00:00 UTC2022-02-22 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 22, 00:002022-02-22 00:00:00 UTC2022-02-22 06:00:00 UTC000
Feb 22, 06:002022-02-22 06:00:00 UTC2022-02-22 12:00:00 UTC000
Feb 22, 12:002022-02-22 12:00:00 UTC2022-02-22 18:00:00 UTC000
Feb 22, 18:002022-02-22 18:00:00 UTC2022-02-23 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 23, 00:002022-02-23 00:00:00 UTC2022-02-23 06:00:00 UTC000
Feb 23, 06:002022-02-23 06:00:00 UTC2022-02-23 12:00:00 UTC000
Feb 23, 12:002022-02-23 12:00:00 UTC2022-02-23 18:00:00 UTC000
Feb 23, 18:002022-02-23 18:00:00 UTC2022-02-24 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 24, 00:002022-02-24 00:00:00 UTC2022-02-24 06:00:00 UTC000
Feb 24, 06:002022-02-24 06:00:00 UTC2022-02-24 12:00:00 UTC000
Feb 24, 12:002022-02-24 12:00:00 UTC2022-02-24 18:00:00 UTC000
Feb 24, 18:002022-02-24 18:00:00 UTC2022-02-25 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 25, 00:002022-02-25 00:00:00 UTC2022-02-25 06:00:00 UTC000
Feb 25, 06:002022-02-25 06:00:00 UTC2022-02-25 12:00:00 UTC000
Feb 25, 12:002022-02-25 12:00:00 UTC2022-02-25 18:00:00 UTC000
Feb 25, 18:002022-02-25 18:00:00 UTC2022-02-26 00:00:00 UTC110

What Hacker News says

5 sources
We discovered (in rclone) that Google are deprecating the auth method you are using - the OOB auth here: https://github.com/simonw/google-drive-to-sqlite/blob/121509... Here is the google page: https://developers.googleblog.com/2022/02/making-oauth-flows... Here is the discussion on the rclone issue - there are links to more stuff there: https://github.com/rclone/rclone/issues/6000 Luckily rclone already implements the oauth webserver for other backends, but for tools like this it has suddenly made authenticating with Google a whole lot harder.
In Show HN: Google Drive to SQLite

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.