HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
simonw
public-notes
Productivity2022–2025
simonw / public-notes

public-notes

Public notes as issue threads

2Distinct people
5Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
34GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Public notes as issue threads

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 10:02:05 AM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year5 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2022-10-11 14:40:21 UTC to 2025-07-02 17:12:53 UTC.

0122022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20222023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments20232024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
I've been using GitHub Issues as a coding journal for a few years now and found it to work incredibly well. I work on most of my projects in public repositories and often end up posting hundreds of issues with thousands of accumulated comments across them all. I also have private repos which I use just for issue threads for coding journal mode entries that I'm not ready to share. Occasionally I'll take one of those private issues and make it public later on, for example this one: https://github.com/simonw/public-notes/issues/1
In The power of keeping a coding journal (2014)
I've been trying to develop the habit of reading the documentation from cover to cover of any tool that I've been using for more than a year or so. I find that reading all of the documentation for a tool you've just started using isn't as valuable: if you haven't gained any experience with it yet, a lot of what you read will fail to stick. Once you have a few months (or years) of experience under your belt doing a thorough review of the documentation can massively increase your abilities with the tool. Here are some notes I made when I finally spent the time to read through every page of the Jinja documentation for example: https://github.com/simonw/public-notes/issues/4
In Why you should still read the docs

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.