meta

> You write this as if that mattered... Should he only works on stuff that gets more download? It was a statement of fact. You appear to be drawing conclusions that were never hinted at nor implied. It's tiresome. > It's normal to be sad to have lost someone that was working on something you needed, but anything else is just entitlement. How and why are you applying entitlement and emotion to a documented statement of fact? Do you need to see links such as [1] to view that as fact? It's one of a myriad. Take your asinine analysis and commentary elsewhere, please. [1] https://github.com/sindresorhus/meta/discussions/15

ESM is the biggest waste of time in the JS ecosystem. People are trying to move thing to ESM before it's even in a stable enough state. Mixing ESM and commonjs is a PITA. I've been a JS-mostly dev since 2013, and I've had enough of ESM ideologues. See https://github.com/sindresorhus/meta/discussions/15 for just ONE example of this mess. I don't know why it's become this ideological war where people are 'testing the waters' on production-used libraries. It's not the approach I would have taken. ESM _is_ the future, but not the present, and I wish people would stop foisting it on packages before its ready.

I've been regularly trying to reduce / remove usage of `null` in various projects. Sindresorhus has some interesting discussions on the topic here[0]. [0] https://github.com/sindresorhus/meta/discussions/7