HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
sircmpwn
rust-poc
HISTORICAL RECORD2014–2014
sircmpwn / rust-poc · Not publicly available

rust-poc

Discover this repository through its Hacker News conversations.

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A public description has not been verified.

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2014-12-12 16:48:12 UTC to 2014-12-12 16:52:22 UTC.

0122014-12-12 16:00:00 UTC to 2014-12-12 17:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 commentsDec 12, 16:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC. One observed period does not establish a trend.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Dec 12, 16:002014-12-12 16:00:00 UTC2014-12-12 17:00:00 UTC202

What Hacker News says

2 sources
That is one, very, very tiny aspect of the C preprocessor. And https://github.com/SirCmpwn/rust-poc/blob/master/includes.rs... is significant: the code included from another file is under a namespace, and isn't going to clash like randomly throwing #includes around will, and you don't need to worry about things like double inclusion... In other words, I think this is a very superficial comparison, and I'm not even sure why it upsets you so. Rust won't be a perfect language for everyone, and that's okay.
In Rust 1.0: Scheduling the trains

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.