HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
SpiderLabs
CryptOMG
PHP2012–2013
SpiderLabs / CryptOMG

CryptOMG

CryptOMG is a configurable CTF style test bed that highlights common flaws in cryptographic implementations.

3Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
195GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

CryptOMG is a configurable CTF style test bed that highlights common flaws in cryptographic implementations.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by month3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2012-06-12 07:20:27 UTC to 2013-03-18 01:05:08 UTC.

012012-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2012-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsJun 20122012-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2012-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2012-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2012-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2012-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2012-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2012-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2012-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsOct 20122012-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2012-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2012-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMar 2013

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jun 20122012-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2012-07-01 00:00:00 UTC110
Jul 20122012-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2012-08-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 20122012-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2012-09-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 20122012-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2012-10-01 00:00:00 UTC110
Oct 20122012-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2012-11-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 20122012-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2012-12-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 20122012-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 20132013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2013-02-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 20132013-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2013-03-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 20132013-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2013-04-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

3 sources
DON'T WORK FOR MATASANO!!! Reasons below: #1 Lack of honesty. Seriously, they promised releasing those crypto challenges publicly 2 years ago (Blackhat 11: Crypto for Pentesters) and never done so: https://twitter.com/matasano/status/101714851633700864. And now they're using them as a recruiting tool. #2 Lack of humility: Matasano guys seem to disregard common tools like Burp scanner or Sqlmap. It's fine to cherry-pick tools to suite your needs; but if you choose to disregard them completely just because you feel they're associated with "Security Rookies" then you're more than likely to miss something, consequently disservice your client (they expect you, as a consultant, to find the most vulnerabilities regardless of tools used). Matasano may have better fuzzer/scanner, but since they don't publicly release them, I found that going aroun
Read the rest
d and bashing other security tools to position themselves higher than their competitors is a sign of arrogance. Go work for other companies, I don't want you HN people turn out to be like them! For those of you who emailed sean at matasano dot com but haven't received any response, go play with Trustwave crypto challeges: https://github.com/SpiderLabs/CryptOMG - And yes they don't have BS subscription model.
In So You Want To Be A Breaker, Part 1: Web Security

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.