HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
spideroak
crypton
HISTORICAL RECORD2013–2016
spideroak / crypton · Not publicly available

crypton

Discover this repository through its Hacker News conversations.

10Distinct people
11Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A public description has not been verified.

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 1:49:46 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year11 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2013-02-26 02:47:45 UTC to 2016-04-26 20:36:31 UTC.

02462013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 6 mentions; 1 submissions, 5 comments20132014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20142015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 2 submissions, 2 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2016

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20132013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC615
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC422
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

11 sources
Sure thing. Context: I'm interested in service discovery solutions (e.g. SmartStack). (Caution: loose brainstorming ahead) Yes, I suppose I'm thinking about how they sync to one another across geography and network partitions. If I understand correctly, one of many great things about etcd over a traditional LDAP store is its chosen method of sync (RE: Two Generals' problem, they sync via Raft instead of Paxos(?)). Without botching the facts, I'll just say that after I read last year about Raft vs. Paxos, I was impressed but was forced to shelve my curiosity for another day. To some extent, I sense a yet-to-be created but potentially very useful/marketable (open source or otherwise) product in this space somewhere (LDAP vs. etcd/Zookeeper/etc, Service Discovery and configuration management). I should definitely go back and read more abou
Read the rest
t Raft and Paxos. In the mean time, thinking more about the problem, I am also not certain how Master-Master is handled in most LDAP sync'ing schemes, though I suspect it would be Paxos. I suppose my question is somewhat of a proxy to this one: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9014319 I am pondering seeding an LDAP cluster (non-traditional schema) from etcd (or similar). A scalable and reliable source of truth is what I'm looking for, I suppose. Would that gain me anything in the way of strict ACLs on reads? etcd does not appear "enterprise ready" in this regard. I'll have to do more research to know. My mind plays crazy tricks sometimes when reading about new tech on HN and lamenting some old tech on the job(s), so there's little accounting for that. Another off the wall thought I had was to evaluate for value creation of an etcd-like service starting from SpiderOak's Crypton framework. In a phrase: A zero-knowledge source of truth for service discovery. https://github.com/SpiderOak/crypton /end layman's rant now. :-) I think too much and research/build too little. Errr!
In Ask HN: Has anyone created an LDAP vs. Raft mashup?
We (SpiderOak) have been working on a framework called Crypton[1] for the last few months that allows you to create cryptographically secure web apps. We're trying to get the 0.2 release and new website[2] out this week. I'm currently the only dev on the project and we could always use more eyeballs. I'm working through a code review right now to improve the existing features, but I'm also half way done implementing shared containers and realtime public key messaging. The idea is that you don't new to understand the crypto if you use the framework. We are in the process of getting a professional security audit. [1] https://github.com/SpiderOak/crypton [2] https://crypton.io
In Ask HN: Any startups working to capitalize on the coming privacy boom?
Hey, I'm one of the developers working on the project. The possibility of "Crypton as a Service" is something we've been thinking about since we started working on this. It's coming soon, but we've been busy getting the fundamentals out - watch for the client SDK which will hook up to a SpiderOak-hosted Crypton server. For a good (though hastily assembled) example of a client-side demo, check out https://github.com/SpiderOak/crypton/tree/master/client/exam...
In Spideroak debuts Crypton, framework for end-to-end encrypted cloud applications

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.