HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
sproutcore
todos
HISTORICAL RECORD2011–2011
sproutcore / todos · Not publicly available

todos

Discover this repository through its Hacker News conversations.

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A public description has not been verified.

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2011-06-18 19:51:38 UTC to 2011-12-08 20:09:40 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

012011-06-13 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-06-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJun 132011-06-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-06-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-06-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-07-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-07-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-07-11 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-07-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-07-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-07-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-07-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-07-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-08-08 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-08-08 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-08-15 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-08-15 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-08-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-08-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-08-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-08-29 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-09-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-09-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-09-12 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsSep 52011-09-12 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-09-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-09-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-09-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-09-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-10-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-10-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-10-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-10-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-10-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-10-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-10-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-10-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-10-31 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-10-31 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-11-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-11-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-11-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-11-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-11-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-11-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-11-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-11-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-12-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-12-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-12-12 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsDec 5

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jun 132011-06-13 00:00:00 UTC2011-06-20 00:00:00 UTC101
Jun 202011-06-20 00:00:00 UTC2011-06-27 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 272011-06-27 00:00:00 UTC2011-07-04 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 42011-07-04 00:00:00 UTC2011-07-11 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 112011-07-11 00:00:00 UTC2011-07-18 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 182011-07-18 00:00:00 UTC2011-07-25 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 252011-07-25 00:00:00 UTC2011-08-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 12011-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2011-08-08 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 82011-08-08 00:00:00 UTC2011-08-15 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 152011-08-15 00:00:00 UTC2011-08-22 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 222011-08-22 00:00:00 UTC2011-08-29 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 292011-08-29 00:00:00 UTC2011-09-05 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 52011-09-05 00:00:00 UTC2011-09-12 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 122011-09-12 00:00:00 UTC2011-09-19 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 192011-09-19 00:00:00 UTC2011-09-26 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 262011-09-26 00:00:00 UTC2011-10-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 32011-10-03 00:00:00 UTC2011-10-10 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 102011-10-10 00:00:00 UTC2011-10-17 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 172011-10-17 00:00:00 UTC2011-10-24 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 242011-10-24 00:00:00 UTC2011-10-31 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 312011-10-31 00:00:00 UTC2011-11-07 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 72011-11-07 00:00:00 UTC2011-11-14 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 142011-11-14 00:00:00 UTC2011-11-21 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 212011-11-21 00:00:00 UTC2011-11-28 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 282011-11-28 00:00:00 UTC2011-12-05 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 52011-12-05 00:00:00 UTC2011-12-12 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
> Neat. Do you have any open-source examples of this simpler "client side application state in one place" up on GitHub? I do not. I plan on writing a blog post on this topic within the month that'll have examples. I'll ping you on twitter when I post it. In the meantime, the Sproutcore todos app has a simple example of this: https://github.com/sproutcore/todos/blob/master/js/app.js#L2... The allAreDone propery. It's not something you'd have in the canonical data you'd send to/from the server but exists as a property so it can be observed and so the template bindings can manipulate it. > If you now have both "model" and a "view-model" for the same resource, one of which has been adopted to be more checkbox-y, just so that its attributes correspond more closely with the DOM ... it would be a shame. The model is more checkboxy but the checkb
Read the rest
oxy bits are initialized from the canonical bits and your sync equivalent has to strip them back off. This is annoying but less annoying than DOM twiddling.
In Announcing Amber.js
The focus of SproutCore 2.0 is building views using Handlebars and the ability to use these views and the data layer in ways that play nicely other frameworks and web technologies. The only real demo so far is the todos app: https://github.com/sproutcore/todos At the Chicago SproutCore Meetup, Tom Dale mentioned that they are working on a new UI toolkit to take the place of the one in SproutCore 1.x. There has been no word when that will be released, but I would expect a widget demo of some kind when it is.
In SproutCore 2.0 Beta 1 Released

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.