HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
SteveRabin
JPSPlusWithGoalBounding
C++2015–2018
SteveRabin / JPSPlusWithGoalBounding

JPSPlusWithGoalBounding

JPS+ and Goal Bounding

4Distinct people
4Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
672GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

JPS+ and Goal Bounding

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year4 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2015-03-22 15:39:42 UTC to 2018-08-17 13:16:31 UTC.

0122015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments20152016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20162017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2018

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC211
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

4 sources
Author of the article here. This implementation of A* was me playing around. It is definitely not optimized for either Ruby or Crystal It was merely a chunk of Ruby code that I had lying around. You are right about the unsorted queue being a hack around Array, but it was part of another experiment of using a "Fast Stack"[1] for the A* algorithm. It allowed me to swap in other Queue implementations easily. The point of the article was merely "How much work does it take to port Ruby to Crystal" The performance differences were just fun to see, not the intent. If I get time, maybe I'll run this through jRuby+Truffle as a comparison, that would be interesting to see. [1] https://github.com/SteveRabin/JPSPlusWithGoalBounding
In From Ruby to Crystal: A Quick Look

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.