HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
substack
npmtop
HISTORICAL RECORD2014–2018
substack / npmtop · Not publicly available

npmtop

Discover this repository through its Hacker News conversations.

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A public description has not been verified.

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 1:49:46 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2014-07-04 05:16:24 UTC to 2018-06-17 15:26:21 UTC.

012014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20142015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20162017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2018

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
While each individual project may have a core group of committers, are they the same people each time? This conclusion was not clear to me from the article, though the Hacker News title implies it. If that is the case, it goes against my experience with open-source. True, individual projects have core committers who drive the project forward - but the ecosystem that springs up around a project doesn't typically derive entirely from this core subset. NPM is likely the best example with 350,000 packages existing on the platform alone with the distribution of developers to packages being fairly uniform (reference: https://github.com/substack/npmtop/blob/master/README.markdo... - mind that the numbers are from 2011, but even back then it was highly uniform).
In Only a few vendor-paid developers do almost all open-source work
One (very arbitrary) metric of TJ's position in the node community: https://github.com/substack/npmtop running it today tells us that he's still number one: rank percent packages author ---- ------- -------- ------ 1 0.60 % 548 tjholowaychuk 2 0.44 % 401 substack 3 0.41 % 379 jongleberry 4 0.40 % 367 dominictarr 5 0.37 % 341 jonschlinkert 6 0.37 % 337 sindresorhus 7 0.36 % 331 juliangruber 8 0.34 % 317 mikolalysenko 9 0.31 % 289 raynos 10 0.28 % 260 mathias 11 0.28 % 257 hughsk 12 0.28 % 255 forbeslindesay 13 0.26 % 239 tootallnate 14 0.23 % 216 clewfirst 15 0.23 % 208 azer
In Farewell Node.js

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.