HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
tableflowhq
csv-import
TypeScript2023–2023
tableflowhq / csv-import

csv-import

The open-source CSV importer, maintained by @tableflowhq

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
1.8KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

The open-source CSV importer, maintained by @tableflowhq

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 12:54:37 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by day2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2023-02-16 23:21:40 UTC to 2023-03-09 15:51:03 UTC.

012023-02-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-02-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsFeb 162023-02-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-02-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-02-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-02-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-02-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-02-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-02-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-02-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-02-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-02-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-02-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-02-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-02-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-02-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-02-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-02-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-02-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-02-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-02-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-02-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsFeb 262023-02-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-02-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-02-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-03-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-03-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-03-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-03-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-03-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-03-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-03-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-03-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-03-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-03-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-03-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-03-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-03-08 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-03-08 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-03-09 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-03-09 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-03-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsMar 9

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Feb 162023-02-16 00:00:00 UTC2023-02-17 00:00:00 UTC110
Feb 172023-02-17 00:00:00 UTC2023-02-18 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 182023-02-18 00:00:00 UTC2023-02-19 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 192023-02-19 00:00:00 UTC2023-02-20 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 202023-02-20 00:00:00 UTC2023-02-21 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 212023-02-21 00:00:00 UTC2023-02-22 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 222023-02-22 00:00:00 UTC2023-02-23 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 232023-02-23 00:00:00 UTC2023-02-24 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 242023-02-24 00:00:00 UTC2023-02-25 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 252023-02-25 00:00:00 UTC2023-02-26 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 262023-02-26 00:00:00 UTC2023-02-27 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 272023-02-27 00:00:00 UTC2023-02-28 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 282023-02-28 00:00:00 UTC2023-03-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 12023-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-03-02 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 22023-03-02 00:00:00 UTC2023-03-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 32023-03-03 00:00:00 UTC2023-03-04 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 42023-03-04 00:00:00 UTC2023-03-05 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 52023-03-05 00:00:00 UTC2023-03-06 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 62023-03-06 00:00:00 UTC2023-03-07 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 72023-03-07 00:00:00 UTC2023-03-08 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 82023-03-08 00:00:00 UTC2023-03-09 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 92023-03-09 00:00:00 UTC2023-03-10 00:00:00 UTC110

What Hacker News says

2 sources
ciminelli·Mar 9, 2023Submission

Show HN: Safe Data Changes in PostgreSQL

Hi HN, we're excited to share our open source tool with the community! We previously posted here with the tagline “real-time events for Postgres” [0]. But after feedback from early users and the community, we’ve shifted our focus to working on tooling for manual database changes. We've consistently heard teams describe challenges with the way manual data updates are handled. Seemingly every engineer we spoke with had examples of errant queries that ended up causing significant harm in production environments (data loss/service interruptions). We’ve seen a few different approaches to how changes to production databases occur today: Option 1: all engineers have production write access (highest speed, highest risk) Option 2: one or a few engineers have write access (medium speed, high risk) Option 3: engineers request temporary access to mak
Read the rest
e changes (low speed, medium risk) Option 4: all updates are checked into version control and run manually or through CI/CD (low speed, low risk) Option 5: no manual updates are made - all changes must go through an internal endpoint (lowest speed, lowest risk) Our goal is to enable high speed changes with the lowest risk possible. We’re planning to do this by providing an open-source toolkit for safeguarding databases, including the following features: - Alerts (available now): Receive notifications any time a manual change occurs - Audit History (beta): View all historical manual changes with context - Query Preview (coming soon): Preview affected rows and query plan prior to running changes - Approval Flow (coming soon): Require query review before a change can be run We’re starting with alerts. Teams can receive Slack notifications anytime an INSERT, UPDATE, or DELETE is executed from a non-application database user. While this doesn’t prevent issues from occurring, it does enable an initial level of traceability and understanding who made an update, what data was changed, and when it occurred. We’d love to hear feedback from the HN community on how you’ve seen database changes handled, pain points you’ve experienced with data change processes, or generally any feedback on our thinking and approach. [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34828169
47 points · Open discussion

Show HN: Inquery (YC W23) – Real-time events for Postgres

Hi HN, we're excited to share our open source tool with the community! Inquery is a utility for Postgres that triggers webhooks when rows are inserted, updated, or deleted. It uses database triggers that send low-latency websocket messages to a Go application. This application then calls any configured webhooks with a JSON payload that includes specified values from the database row. Let us know if you have any feedback or questions!
23 points · Open discussion

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.