HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
tastejs
todomvc
JavaScript2011–2025
tastejs / todomvc

todomvc

Helping you select a JavaScript framework - Todo apps for React.js, Angular, Vue and many more

35Distinct people
39Mentions
2Explicit recommenders
29KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Helping you select a JavaScript framework - Todo apps for React.js, Angular, Vue and many more

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

I highly recommend this road as well. Three exercises along the lines of the parent that I found particularly valuable: 1. Compare VanillaJS TodoMVC to your framework of choice…

sirgawain33 used a recommendation phrase. 2 indexed comments match. This is a phrase match, not a verdict.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 12:03:30 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year39 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2011-09-12 12:22:56 UTC to 2025-10-25 18:52:01 UTC.

02468102011-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments20112012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 10 mentions; 1 submissions, 9 comments2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 9 mentions; 0 submissions, 9 comments2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 1 submissions, 4 comments2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 0 submissions, 4 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20182019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20112011-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC211
20122012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC1019
20132013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC909
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC514
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC404
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

From the project README

An excerpt from the repository, fetched Nov 13, 2026.

Read the project’s introduction
Helping you select a JavaScript framework Website    Blog    TasteJS Developers have a number of choices today when it comes to selecting a JavaScript framework or UI library for building scalable web apps. React, Vue, Svelte, Angular, Solid, Lit... the list of solutions continues to grow, but just how do you decide on which to use in a sea of so many options? To help solve this problem, we created TodoMVC - a project which offers the same Todo application implemented in most of the popular JavaScript frameworks of the day. Each example is functionally identical and follows the same app specification, so you can compare syntax, structure, and idioms side by side on equal footing. TodoMVC has been the de-facto teaching example for UI frameworks for over a decade, and forms the core of the cross-browser Speedometer benchmark used by every major browser engine to optimize UI performance. Examples The actively maintained examples in this repo are kept current with their framework's latest stable line. As of TodoMVC 2.0: React 19 Vue 3.5 Angular 21 Svelte 5 (with runes) Preact 10 Lit 3.3 React Redux 9 (with Redux Toolkit 2) Plenty of legacy framework showcases also live in examples/ for historical reference. See the website for the full list. Build a TodoMVC App with Your AI Coding Agent The app spec is plain Markdown and reads cleanly into any modern AI coding agent (Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Codex, Gemini Code Assist, Aider, and so on). To generate a fresh implementation in a framework or language that isn't on the list above, drop this prompt into your agent of choice: Build a TodoMVC app following this spec https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tastejs/todomvc/refs/heads/master/app-spec.md in React Replace React with Vue, Svelte, Angular, Solid, Lit, Preact, Qwik, or any framework or language you want to evaluate. The result follows the same behavioural surface every example in this repo implements (add, edit, toggle, filter, route, clear completed), so it's directly comparable to the reference apps. Running the examples and tests Each example builds and serves itself. Most modern apps use Vite, webpack, or rollup; cd into an example, install, and run: $ cd examples/react $ npm install $ npm run build $ npm run serve To run the Cypress test suite against the maintained examples: $ npm install $ npm run test:all npm run test:all defaults to the curated modern set. Pass --all to sweep every example in examples/, or --framework=react to target a single one. See tests/README.md for details. Team TodoMVC would not be possible without a strong team of contributors helping push the project forward each day. Additionally, we have a core project team composed of: Addy Osmani - Founder/Lead Addy is a Software Engineer at Google who originally created TodoMVC. He oversees the project direction, maintenance and organizes the planning and development efforts of the team. Sindre Sorhus - Lead Developer Sindre is a Web Developer who leads core development, quality control and application design for the project. His engineering contributions have helped us ensure consistency and best practices are enforced wherever possible. Sindre also leads up development of the TodoMVC application spec. Pascal Hartig - Developer Pascal is a Software Engineer at Twitter with a deep passion for consistency. He watches pull requests and helps developers getting their contributions integrated with TodoMVC. Stephen Sawchuk - Developer Stephen is a Front-end Engineer at Quicken Loans that cares about improving the maintainability and developer experience of open-source projects. His recent contributions include helping us move all apps over to using Bower and implementing the new information bar. Colin Eberhardt - Developer Colin is a software consultant at Scott Logic who is passionate about all software - from JavaScript to Java, and C# to Objective-C. His recent contribution to the project has been a fully automated test suite. Sam Saccone - Developer Sam is a Software Engineer at Google who is driven by an endless desire to create, solve problems, and improve developers' lives. Arthur Verschaeve - Developer Arthur is an open-source fanboy from Belgium. He is passionate about developer tooling and all things JavaScript. Fady Samir Sadek - Developer Fady is a front-end developer who loves all things JavaScript and enjoys solving real world problems using the web platform and helping other developers do the same. He currently leads maintenance of the project and ensures that the project is friendly for new contributors and upcoming developers. Gianni Chiappetta - Logo designer Gianni is a programmer and designer currently working as the Chief Rigger at MetaLab. Disclaimer TodoMVC has been called many things including the 'Speed-dating' and 'Rosetta Stone' of JavaScript frameworks. Whilst we hope that this project can offer assistance in deciding what frameworks are worth spending more time looking at, remember that the Todo application offers a limited view of a framework's potential capability. It is meant to be used as a gateway to reviewing how a basic application using a framework may be structured, and we heavily recommend investing time researching a solution in more depth before opting to use it. Also, please keep in mind that TodoMVC is not the perfect way to compare the size of different frameworks. We intentionally use the unminified versions to make reading the source code easier. Getting Involved Whilst we enjoy implementing and improving existing Todo apps, we're always interested in speaking to framework authors (and users) wishing to share Todo app implementations in their framework/solution of choice. Check out our contribution docs for more info. License Everything in this repo is MIT License unless otherwise specified. MIT © Addy Osmani, Sindre Sorhus, Pascal Hartig, Stephen Sawchuk.
Read the full README on GitHub

What Hacker News says

4 sources
I don't know much about Ember, so I don't want to compare it with NX here. I just submitted an NX todoMVC: https://github.com/tastejs/todomvc/pull/1679/files. If you would like to, you can compare it with the Ember one: https://github.com/tastejs/todomvc/tree/master/examples/embe.... Side note: since it seems like comparisons are requested, I plan to implement the official show off/introduction apps of other frameworks in NX as a way of objective comparison.
In Show HN: A next gen front-end framework with lots of editable examples
The cost of transpiling es2015 isn't very visible here, because the "vanilla es6 TodoMVC" example used [1] doesn't rely heavily on ES6 only features, such as generator functions etc., that aren't just sugar on top of ES5. Such features are expected to decrease the performance of the generated code significantly and should be taken into account when a transpilation step is involved. [1] https://github.com/tastejs/todomvc/tree/master/examples/vani...
In The cost of transpiling ES2015 in 2016

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.