HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
thewhitetulip
Tasks
Go2015–2017
thewhitetulip / Tasks

Tasks

A simplistic todo list manager written in Go

Productivity
Explore on GitHubRead Hacker News discussions
2Distinct people
18Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
561GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A simplistic todo list manager written in Go

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 8:03:49 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by month18 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2015-11-15 16:39:10 UTC to 2017-03-20 07:43:36 UTC.

012342015-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsNov 20152015-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments2016-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJul 20162016-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2016-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2016-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2016-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 0 submissions, 4 comments2016-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2017-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2017-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMar 2017

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Nov 20152015-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-12-01 00:00:00 UTC110
Dec 20152015-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-02-01 00:00:00 UTC211
Feb 20162016-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-03-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 20162016-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-04-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 20162016-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-05-01 00:00:00 UTC000
May 20162016-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-06-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 20162016-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-07-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 20162016-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-08-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 20162016-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-09-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Sep 20162016-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-10-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Oct 20162016-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-11-01 00:00:00 UTC202
Nov 20162016-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-12-01 00:00:00 UTC404
Dec 20162016-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
Jan 20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-02-01 00:00:00 UTC202
Feb 20172017-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-03-01 00:00:00 UTC202
Mar 20172017-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-04-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

4 sources
thewhitetulip·Nov 26, 2016
I've written an introductory book on Go http://github.com/thewhitetulip/web-dev-golang-anti-textbook, it taught hoe to write a webapp in Go without using a framework. Earlier, it taught basic html, now I am rewriting the Tasks app, http://github.com/thewhitetulip/Tasks/, to use the front end framework http://vuejs.org, using the learning of my experiment, I'm putting together anther series of tutorials, http://github.com/thewhitetulip/intro-to-vuejs. Thid is because I wanted an easy to understand tutorial which doesn't expect the user to have anything more than basic html/css/js knowledge. edit: links
In Ask HN: What projects are you currently working on?
thewhitetulip·Nov 26, 2016
Yes, /r/golang is way more friendlier than go-nuts. I say this by proof. 1. One year ago I started learning Go. It was difficult to understand it, I read a lot of books and stuff. I started working on http://github.com/thewhitetulip/Tasks, Later, I realised that there isn't a free resource to teach what I learned, so I tried to share my knowledge by creating this, http://github.com/thewhitetulip/web-dev-golang-anti-textbook.... The first post I made was to /r/golang: I got immensely +ve feedback, suggestions etc. The second post I made was that google group, I was told "The language is called Go and not Golang" and the condensed feedback from the elites was (after someone rallied behind me saying that give real feedback and this is being jerk and blah blah) that "it might be the case that suraj wrote a good book but people won't take it s
Read the rest
eriously until the language name is corectly used" Who cares about the title of the book? I certainly don't. I have read astaxie's book, codegansta's book, both had golang in their title. Their content was amazing. I loved them, didn't care about the title The links are below As another instance, I wanted help in AJAX one year ago, I asked /r/golang, I got two examples in half hour, one with plain JS another with jquery. Do you really think that if /r/golang was so "toxic" and "scum" as they call it on the go-nuts mailing list (a glaring violation of the CoC shoved down our throats) that there would be a consensus among /r/golang to unequivocally say "if Go authors don't participate in /r/golang then they are welcome to step down?" I do not understand what they want to do, Guido created python, is he the mod of /r/python, does he care what authors name their book? "oh the language is Python with a capital P", no, he does what he does and let's the community handle the community. my exp with /r/golang https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/5dkobc/sample_webap... https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/56mgxb/learn_how_to... https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/50ih0s/whats_up_wit... https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/4zyjye/network_prog... https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/4kbup2/can_webapps_... https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/4jxtdg/building_an_... https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/4jaiun/updated_my_t... https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/4ihjk7/added_sessio... https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/46vb6x/want_to_disc... https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/45uqpw/updated_my_t... https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/439asd/simple_comma... https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/3zle8c/i_am_writing... The fact that I do not have a single (+ve) link on go-nuts speaks volumes about which forum is toxic. Just read this thread which I started on go-nuts https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/golang-nuts/F4LJwyYZcX... And tell me later which community is helpful.
In Deleting the golang subreddit
thewhitetulip·Nov 15, 2016
>do you accurately comment the code you write for fun Mostly, yes. But not when I am learning stuff, for eg, http://github.com/thewhitetulip/Tasks is a small app I built, there are next to no comments there because I was learning the language and thus didn't write much comments there. I understand docs are pain to maintain, but a good FOSS project which is coding related (like a code library) is an amalgamation of the code AND the docs. The first preference goes to the lib with a great documentation. >not as rewarding as aligning correct lines of codes Yes, but when we look at the reward incorrectly! Yes, nobody will hail your contribution, but the fact that the project will be hailed because of the docs is not thought about mostly. >but chances are they will ask trivial question that do not concern the project This might not be a gross m
Read the rest
isrepresentation, but yes, sometimes there will be audience who doesn't fit in your project's audience, but what about the audience who fits? I recently started learning a front end framework, I am totally new to a front end framework, I do not like frameworks, I learned and wrote a book on Go without using framework (https://github.com/thewhitetulip/web-dev-golang-anti-textboo...). The docs are awesome of the project, I mean it. They teach the basics of the framework but _not_ how to use it in an actual project. Yes, if I know how to bind a variable via the docs it is great, but I do not know how to build a single page app just by reading how to bind a variable. It is a pre-requisite though. For a framework which wants to be the top framework, I feel that there needs to be docs not just about the APIs but also about how to use it in a real project. P.S: In the past, while commenting partially negatively about something, a person had taken huge efforts to crawl back on my HN/reddit comment history and calling out the names, I am intentionally leaving the name out of the comment; This is a general thing across all projects, not just the one I am complaining about.
In Ask HN: Why are FOSS projects beginner unfriendly?

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.