HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
tobi
liquid
Ruby2010–2010
tobi / liquid

liquid

Liquid markup language. Safe, customer facing template language for flexible web apps.

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
3GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Liquid markup language. Safe, customer facing template language for flexible web apps.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:03:16 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2010-06-26 02:07:51 UTC to 2010-09-27 11:59:38 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

012010-06-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-06-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJun 212010-06-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-07-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-07-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-07-12 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-07-12 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-07-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-07-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-07-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-07-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-08-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-08-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-08-09 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-08-09 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-08-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsAug 92010-08-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-08-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-08-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-08-30 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-08-30 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-09-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-09-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-09-13 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-09-13 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-09-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-09-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-09-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-09-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-10-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsSep 27

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jun 212010-06-21 00:00:00 UTC2010-06-28 00:00:00 UTC101
Jun 282010-06-28 00:00:00 UTC2010-07-05 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 52010-07-05 00:00:00 UTC2010-07-12 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 122010-07-12 00:00:00 UTC2010-07-19 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 192010-07-19 00:00:00 UTC2010-07-26 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 262010-07-26 00:00:00 UTC2010-08-02 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 22010-08-02 00:00:00 UTC2010-08-09 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 92010-08-09 00:00:00 UTC2010-08-16 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 162010-08-16 00:00:00 UTC2010-08-23 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 232010-08-23 00:00:00 UTC2010-08-30 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 302010-08-30 00:00:00 UTC2010-09-06 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 62010-09-06 00:00:00 UTC2010-09-13 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 132010-09-13 00:00:00 UTC2010-09-20 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 202010-09-20 00:00:00 UTC2010-09-27 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 272010-09-27 00:00:00 UTC2010-10-04 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
I've been building Shopify themes for the last couple of years. Part of the reason that I've stuck with it so long is that Liquid is really easy to learn. I'm of the opinion that anyone capable of understanding a for loop and if statement can learn the basics of Liquid within a day. I know there are a few other apps that use Liquid, including one of your competitors. See here for a list: http://github.com/tobi/liquid/wiki From an end-user perspective, I'd highly recommend Liquid. I don't see how you can escape having a template language of some sort, and Liquid seems more thought-out than most.
In Ask HN: Are there any design-led frameworks out there or should I create my own?
To the best of my recollection, Jekyll itself plays nicely with 1.9.1. It's Liquid that was a problem for me. The Gemcutter.org version of Liquid (2.0) is not 1.9 safe. However, the version at Github (2.1) is. http://github.com/tobi/liquid Since the commit to fix Liquid for 1.9.1 was in April of 2009, I wonder why it's not the version on Gemcutter? (Or some version of that version, if there are other issues...) Edit: Yup, just checked. Jekyll with Liquid 2.1 is fine on 1.9.1. (I'm on OSX here, but the 1.9.1 I checked is also patch level 378.) All of that said, rvm is outstanding.
In The New Ruby Ecosystem

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.