HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
tonbistudio
turboquant-pytorch
Python2026–2026
tonbistudio / turboquant-pytorch

turboquant-pytorch

From-scratch PyTorch implementation of Google's TurboQuant (ICLR 2026) for LLM KV cache compression. 5x compression at 3-bit with 99.5% attention fidelity.

3Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
1KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

From-scratch PyTorch implementation of Google's TurboQuant (ICLR 2026) for LLM KV cache compression. 5x compression at 3-bit with 99.5% attention fidelity.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by day3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2026-03-25 11:48:50 UTC to 2026-04-03 21:59:20 UTC.

012026-03-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMar 252026-03-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-03-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2026-03-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-03-29 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-30 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsMar 292026-03-30 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-31 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-03-31 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsApr 3

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Mar 252026-03-25 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-26 00:00:00 UTC101
Mar 262026-03-26 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-27 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 272026-03-27 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-28 00:00:00 UTC101
Mar 282026-03-28 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-29 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 292026-03-29 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-30 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 302026-03-30 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-31 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 312026-03-31 00:00:00 UTC2026-04-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 12026-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-04-02 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 22026-04-02 00:00:00 UTC2026-04-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 32026-04-03 00:00:00 UTC2026-04-04 00:00:00 UTC110

What Hacker News says

3 sources
These "truths" are more like concerns. Skills do atrophy if you don't practice them, but also, refreshing your memory about some technology you haven't used in a while, or even learning something new, is easier than ever. You can ask the AI questions and try things out yourself very easily. Maybe "just in time" learning isn't good enough, but that's more of a concern based on speculation than a truth. AI is being subsidized, but also, inference costs are dropping due to algorithmic improvements. For example, TurboQuant [1] looks pretty promising and even if it doesn't pan out, there are plenty of other potential advances like that. Competition might result in AI inference being available at good prices even without subsidies. So, again, more of a concern than a "truth." Prompt injection: an unsolved mess, but perhaps curated, trusted data
Read the rest
sets will be good enough for many projects, so you don't have to expose your agent to the open Internet? It's a similar problem to the supply-chain vulnerabilities that downloadable open source libraries have. A valid concern, but it seems like we'll improve security and muddle through? Copyright: also an unsolved mess, but kind of similar. Search engines copy the web as part of how they work, but that didn't stop Google from becoming big tech. And sure, Napster was built on copying music and was shut down, but YouTube was also built on widespread copyright violation and it muddled through. It's unclear whether copyright law is load-bearing infrastructure for the software industry or for open source software. [1] https://github.com/tonbistudio/turboquant-pytorch
In Some uncomfortable truths about AI coding agents

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.