HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
tosdr
tosback2
C2013–2017
tosdr / tosback2

tosback2

Reimplementing TOSBack with Ruby and using git to see TOS changes!

3Distinct people
5Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
125GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Reimplementing TOSBack with Ruby and using git to see TOS changes!

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year5 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2013-05-05 07:39:01 UTC to 2017-08-15 00:55:53 UTC.

01232013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20132014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 1 submissions, 2 comments2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20152016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2017

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20132013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC312
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

5 sources
Hi, thanks for your comment. For reference, here's what we're showing on tosdr.org: > Google can share your personal information with other parties > Google will share your personal information with other parties. For sensitive information (medical, racial, ethnic, political, religious or sexuality) Google requires “opt-in”. Google can also share or publish aggregated data that does not identify a person Now, what I am writing in the "discussion" forum is not on tosdr.org exactly because it is all difficult to interpret. My conclusion, is what is on tosdr.org -- if you think the current statement written there is wrong, please submit a patch :) Now about what I wrote under "discussion" (which is as it suggests, all here to be discussed:) Yes, it does not sound legal in the EU. That's actually the whole problem and why Google is currently
Read the rest
under scrutiny by European Data protection agencies. http://www.cnil.fr/english/news-and-events/news/article/goog... I'm welcoming your opinion (and anybody's) about this in reply to what I wrote https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tosdr/QZgR8faRWDU/PatkxP2G-B... :) About the EFF, we're working with them on ToSback (http://github.com/tosdr/tosback2 and http://github.com/tosdr/tosback3). I actually also believe that ToS;DR should have more resources and more contributions from orgs like the EFF ;) Edit: fixed the github links
In Google ToS rated: “keeps your searches and logs for an undefined period of time”

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.