HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
TransformerOptimus
SuperAGI
Python2023–2023
TransformerOptimus / SuperAGI

SuperAGI

<⚡️> SuperAGI - A dev-first open source autonomous AI agent framework. Enabling developers to build, manage & run useful autonomous agents quickly and reliably.

3Distinct people
4Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
17.7KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

<⚡️> SuperAGI - A dev-first open source autonomous AI agent framework. Enabling developers to build, manage & run useful autonomous agents quickly and reliably.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week4 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2023-05-24 07:02:01 UTC to 2023-11-07 01:21:01 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

0122023-05-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-05-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsMay 222023-05-29 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-06-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-06-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-06-12 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-06-12 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-06-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-06-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-06-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments2023-06-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-07-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-07-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-07-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-07-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-07-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-07-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-07-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-07-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-07-31 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-07-31 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-08-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-08-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-08-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-08-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-08-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsAug 142023-08-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-08-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-08-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-09-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-11 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-09-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-09-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-09-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-10-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-10-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-10-09 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-10-09 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-10-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-10-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-10-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-10-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-10-30 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-10-30 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-11-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-11-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-11-13 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsNov 6

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
May 222023-05-22 00:00:00 UTC2023-05-29 00:00:00 UTC110
May 292023-05-29 00:00:00 UTC2023-06-05 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 52023-06-05 00:00:00 UTC2023-06-12 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 122023-06-12 00:00:00 UTC2023-06-19 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 192023-06-19 00:00:00 UTC2023-06-26 00:00:00 UTC211
Jun 262023-06-26 00:00:00 UTC2023-07-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 32023-07-03 00:00:00 UTC2023-07-10 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 102023-07-10 00:00:00 UTC2023-07-17 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 172023-07-17 00:00:00 UTC2023-07-24 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 242023-07-24 00:00:00 UTC2023-07-31 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 312023-07-31 00:00:00 UTC2023-08-07 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 72023-08-07 00:00:00 UTC2023-08-14 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 142023-08-14 00:00:00 UTC2023-08-21 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 212023-08-21 00:00:00 UTC2023-08-28 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 282023-08-28 00:00:00 UTC2023-09-04 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 42023-09-04 00:00:00 UTC2023-09-11 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 112023-09-11 00:00:00 UTC2023-09-18 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 182023-09-18 00:00:00 UTC2023-09-25 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 252023-09-25 00:00:00 UTC2023-10-02 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 22023-10-02 00:00:00 UTC2023-10-09 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 92023-10-09 00:00:00 UTC2023-10-16 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 162023-10-16 00:00:00 UTC2023-10-23 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 232023-10-23 00:00:00 UTC2023-10-30 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 302023-10-30 00:00:00 UTC2023-11-06 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 62023-11-06 00:00:00 UTC2023-11-13 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

4 sources
I agree on the excerpt on agents. Reliability and reproducibility of task completion is the biggest problem for agents to cross the chasm to real life use cases. When agents are given an objective, they think everything from first principles or scratch about next best action to complete the objective and agent trajectory ends up becoming more of a linguistic dance. But we are solving some of the agent specific problems at SuperAGI https://github.com/TransformerOptimus/SuperAGI ( disclaimer : Im creator of it ) by doing agent trajectory fine tuning using recursive instructions. Think about objective as telling agent to go from A to B and instructions are akin to giving it directions about the route. And this instruction can be self created after every run and fed into subsequent runs to improve the trajectory. Other problem with agent is :
Read the rest
most independent agents are capable of doing very thin slice of use case, but for complex knowledge work tasks, more often than not, one agent is not enough. You need a team of agents. We introduced a concept of Agent Clusters - which operate in master slave architecture and coordinating among themselves to complete nuanced tasks and coordinating via shared memory and shared task list. Another big bottleneck I think is lack of a notional concept of Knowledge for Agents. We have LTM and STM, but knowledge is specialized understanding of particular class of objectives ( ecommerce customer support, Account based marketing, medical diagnostics for particular condition etc ) plugged into the agent. Currently agents leverage on the knowledge available in the LLMs. LLMs are great for intelligence, but not necessarily knowledge required for an objective. So we added concept of knowledge - which is a embedding plugged into agent apart from LTM / STM There lot of other challenges that need to solved like agent performance monitoring, agent specific models, agent to agent communication etc to truly solve for agents deployed in production. Not sure about point mentioned in the article that they might even take over the entire stack because autonomous agentic behaviour is good for certain use cases and not for all kinds of apps.
In Emerging architectures for LLM applications

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.