HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
travisbrown
blue
OPEN SOURCE2023–2023
travisbrown / blue

blue

Twitter Blue data

2Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
116GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Twitter Blue data

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2023-04-23 02:13:41 UTC to 2023-09-29 01:07:00 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

012023-04-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-04-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsApr 172023-04-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-05-08 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-05-08 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-05-15 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-05-15 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-05-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-05-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-05-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-05-29 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-06-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-06-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-06-12 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-06-12 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-06-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-06-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-06-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2023-06-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-07-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-07-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-07-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJul 32023-07-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-07-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-07-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-07-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-07-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-07-31 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-07-31 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-08-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-08-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-08-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-08-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-08-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-08-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-08-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-08-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-09-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-11 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-09-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-09-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-09-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-10-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsSep 25

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Apr 172023-04-17 00:00:00 UTC2023-04-24 00:00:00 UTC101
Apr 242023-04-24 00:00:00 UTC2023-05-01 00:00:00 UTC000
May 12023-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-05-08 00:00:00 UTC000
May 82023-05-08 00:00:00 UTC2023-05-15 00:00:00 UTC000
May 152023-05-15 00:00:00 UTC2023-05-22 00:00:00 UTC000
May 222023-05-22 00:00:00 UTC2023-05-29 00:00:00 UTC000
May 292023-05-29 00:00:00 UTC2023-06-05 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 52023-06-05 00:00:00 UTC2023-06-12 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 122023-06-12 00:00:00 UTC2023-06-19 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 192023-06-19 00:00:00 UTC2023-06-26 00:00:00 UTC101
Jun 262023-06-26 00:00:00 UTC2023-07-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 32023-07-03 00:00:00 UTC2023-07-10 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 102023-07-10 00:00:00 UTC2023-07-17 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 172023-07-17 00:00:00 UTC2023-07-24 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 242023-07-24 00:00:00 UTC2023-07-31 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 312023-07-31 00:00:00 UTC2023-08-07 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 72023-08-07 00:00:00 UTC2023-08-14 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 142023-08-14 00:00:00 UTC2023-08-21 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 212023-08-21 00:00:00 UTC2023-08-28 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 282023-08-28 00:00:00 UTC2023-09-04 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 42023-09-04 00:00:00 UTC2023-09-11 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 112023-09-11 00:00:00 UTC2023-09-18 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 182023-09-18 00:00:00 UTC2023-09-25 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 252023-09-25 00:00:00 UTC2023-10-02 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

3 sources
In the Australian App Store right now: - TikTok (#11) - Instagram (#12) - Facebook (#18) - Threads (#25) - X (#123) So based on available data it clearly isn't where it used to be in terms of popularity. And based on poor Twitter Blue subscription numbers [1] and the fact advertising revenue has halved [2] the company isn't financially doing so well either. [1] https://github.com/travisbrown/blue [2] https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/twitters-ad-revenue-has-s...
In Mozilla.social mastodon waitlist
Because Twitter is trending towards bankruptcy. a) It is valued at about a 1/4 of what it was purchased at. b) Twitter Blue has generated an irrelevant amount of revenue and churn is increasing [1]. c) Roadmap looks poor. Video is a terrible direction where only Google, Amazon, TikTok etc have been able to make the numbers work and that's because it is subsidised through other revenue sources. Payments is DOA given Twitter's inability to comply with existing regulations let alone how difficult KYC/AML is to manage. d) Regulatory and legal risk increases by the day. Lawsuits continue to pile up and EU/FTC are hovering around as Twitter is not in compliance with previous agreements. e) Brand safety continues to be a huge challenge that isn't solvable without effectively going back to what Twitter was previously. f) BlueSky and Instagram are
Read the rest
both releasing competitor apps to the broader public in the coming months. The market simply won't sustain this many text-based social media apps. [1] https://github.com/travisbrown/blue
In GPT4 is 8 x 220B params = 1.7T params
Travis Brown has a repo[0] listing all known Blue subscribers, regularly updated. I believe there's some libraries with reverse-engineered support for Twitter's private API that you should be able to feed the data into. (I've been reusing the keys for an old project; I believe if you didn't already register one, then official access to the blocking API endpoint costs $42,000/month.) [0]: https://github.com/travisbrown/blue
In Twitter power users begin campaign to 'Block the Blue' paid checkmarks

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.