HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
tschellenbach
Stream-Framework
Python2013–2018
tschellenbach / Stream-Framework

Stream-Framework

Stream Framework is a Python library, which allows you to build news feed, activity streams and notification systems using Cassandra and/or Redis. The authors of Stream-Framework also provide a cloud service for feed technology:

10Distinct people
13Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
4.7KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Stream Framework is a Python library, which allows you to build news feed, activity streams and notification systems using Cassandra and/or Redis. The authors of Stream-Framework also provide a cloud service for feed technology:

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 1:49:46 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year13 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2013-07-09 09:54:27 UTC to 2018-05-24 23:58:12 UTC.

012342013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 2 submissions, 1 comments20132014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments20152016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 1 submissions, 3 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2018

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20132013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC321
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC211
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC413
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202

What Hacker News says

13 sources
If you want to read more about activity feeds there are a ton of papers listed here: https://github.com/tschellenbach/stream-framework I've been working on this stuff for years. Recently I've also enjoyed reading Linkedin's posts about their feed tech. Three are a few different posts but here's one of them: https://engineering.linkedin.com/blog/2016/03/followfeed--li... Scaling a social network is just inherently a very hard problem. Especially if you have a large userbase with a few very popular users. Stackshare recently did a nice blogpost about how we at Stream solve this for 300 million users with Go, RocksDB and Raft: https://stackshare.io/stream/stream-and-go-news-feeds-for-ov... I think the most important part is using a combination of push and pull. So you keep the most popular users in memory and for the other users you use the
Read the rest
traditional fanout on-write approach. The other thing that helped us scale was using Go+RocksDB. The throughput is just so much higher compared to traditional databases like Cassandra. It's also interesting to note how other companies solved it. Instagram used a fanout on write approach with Redis, later on Cassandra and eventually a flavor of Cassandra based on RocksDB. They managed to use a full fanout approach using a combination of great optimization, a relatively lower posting volume (compared to Twitter at least) and a ton of VC money. Friendster and Hyves are two stories of companies that didn't really manage to solve this and went out of business. (there were probably other factors as well, but still.) I also heard one investor mention how Tumblr struggled with technical debt related to their feed. A more recent example is Vero that basically collapsed under scaling issues.
In In Twitter’s early days, only one celebrity could tweet at a time

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.