HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
UgnisSoftware
design-system-builder
TypeScript2017–2022
UgnisSoftware / design-system-builder

design-system-builder

Design System Builder

2Distinct people
5Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
247GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Design System Builder

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year5 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2017-08-18 07:55:20 UTC to 2022-05-02 07:18:03 UTC.

01232017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 1 submissions, 2 comments20172018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20192020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2022

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC312
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110

What Hacker News says

5 sources
If you don't have to support IE11, there has been a very interesting trend of JS Proxy based state managers (immer, react-easy-state, overmind, etc.). It reduces the boilerplate compared to redux while giving basically the same architecture. I have been using my own implementation, because react-easy-state did not work well with styled components (https://github.com/UgnisSoftware/lape), while I was building https://github.com/UgnisSoftware/Ugnis if you want to see this approach in use.
In Ask HN: How do you manage state in your React application?
> Do you not count e.g. jQuery as a framework? Not really, it was used as a library to make JS work consistently across browsers and add missing features like querySelector and ajax fetch. But it had no opinion on how you should structure your app. Angular, Backbone and Ember is from the same post-jQuery era when talks about Web components started. > Being standardized, i.e. any old framework that can work with the DOM can with them But does a developer really care that it's possible to use the same component in different frameworks, when you need it to work with just one (yours)? I think the biggest fallacy is that people expect a technology to appear where you could just drop the component and it would work perfectly. From my experience, that will never happen - external component libraries are 90% what you need and 10% of hacking aroun
Read the rest
d missing features. The easier it is to safely and predictable hack the last 10% the better the framework/component library is. Web Components provide nothing that help in UI development: Helps manage multiple components state? Nope. Provide a declarative API for components? Nope, imperative - the one we are trying to get away from. Prevent CSS from affecting components? Cool, or I could just not write global styles, use BEM or CSS modules. Easy to share components? NPM still works just fine for that. > It's a massive waste of resources that M > 1 Agreed, that's something I thought a lot about. So I have created a cross-framework visual component editor - one component exports to many frameworks: https://github.com/UgnisSoftware/ugnis
In The end of Framework Churn

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.