unipdf

This is kind of neat, but I am intensely irritated at software on github whose license is: pay us money before you use this (https://github.com/unidoc/unipdf/blob/master/LICENSE.md). There's nothing wrong with commercial software, but why put it on github?

> No one uses AGPL for libraries, except maybe by mistake. This isn't my experience at all. Here's an example: https://github.com/unidoc/unipdf/blob/master/LICENSE.md > The AGPL is not viral in the sense that all client software accessing an AGPL-licensed service are required to use the AGPL, but rather, such clients are entitled to the source of that service. It puts no obligations whatsoever on client software. This depends on what your "client" is. If you're making library calls, lawyers get uncomfortable. > Maybe you should actually read up on the AGPL license before you make assumptions about it? It seems like you don't really understand it. I understand it quite well, and I even use it myself! There are just problems associated with it that most proponents gloss over.