HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
vercel
pkg
JavaScript2017–2024
vercel / pkg · Archived

pkg

Package your Node.js project into an executable

36Distinct people
44Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
24.3KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Package your Node.js project into an executable

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 4:01:40 AM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year44 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2017-04-29 18:18:21 UTC to 2024-04-01 18:03:34 UTC.

02468102017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 10 mentions; 1 submissions, 9 comments20172018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 8 mentions; 0 submissions, 8 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 0 submissions, 4 comments20202021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 0 submissions, 5 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 8 mentions; 2 submissions, 6 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 6 mentions; 1 submissions, 5 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2024

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC1019
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC808
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC404
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC505
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC826
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC615
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202

What Hacker News says

5 sources
So I think the ultimate answer is that there is no standardized way to do some of these things on the web. There are many ways to accomplish UI as listed, I'll explain some here for a React app as an example. * Tree view [0]: There is no browser level widget for this type of UI, so in a React app we would include the needed code as a dependency through NPM, and prepared for a browser with a bundler. For a tree view I think most devs would consider using a library/dependency. * Resizable Pane [1]: Technically some resizing can be done with CSS but it's pretty superficial. I think many frontend devs would roll this themselves with some basic JS. * Scrollable Container [2]: This is firmly in the CSS wheelhouse, and most cases will be handled by the overflow property. Some more advanced cases might use react-window [3] for a virtualized list,
Read the rest
when you have 1000s of items. * Spin buttons [4]: Here HTML does have us covered, as well as other basic controls like selects (drop downs), radio buttons, and checkboxes. But again if unhappy with the look you'll be reimplementing it with some light JS. I'm a ~10yr frontend-ish web dev and have found this thread very interesting, thanks for sharing and discussing. On the web just don't have that standardized library of widgets like GTK+ or Qt, MUI is probably the closest, and that narrows you into a React app in most cases. As for the vocabulary, a few things come to mind. * Very low barrier to entry, just need Notepad and a browser, nothing to compile or install. One can find a beginning career without knowing much about coding logic at all. It wasn't until I moved into "modern" JS and "back of front-end" that I began to learn formal patterns and principles, and I still consider myself quite a novice in them. * GUI exists on the barrier between design and code, so is hard to formalize and document in general. Additionally the culture of web development is slightly different, in that the expectation is every little thing can be styled and customized. This is at odds with the native approach, where a button looks like a OS button no matter what. This culture of customization/branding contributes to things like Electron where web CSS can be directly reused. Thanks again for starting this thread, I've looked at making cross platform desktop applications before, but quickly abandoned it as it was so foreign to me. I usually opt for a small pkg'd [5] node server for my hobby application, exposing the GUI via a browser pointed to localhost. [0] https://mui.com/components/tree-view/ [1] https://www.npmjs.com/package/react-resize-panel [2] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/overflow\ [3] https://react-window.vercel.app/#/examples/list/fixed-size [4] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/in... [5] https://github.com/vercel/pkg
In Ask HN: What are the fundamental diffs between modern web vs. desktop UI models

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.