HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
viggy28
pg_savior
C2024–2026
viggy28 / pg_savior

pg_savior

A postgres extension to avoid accidental mistakes

3Distinct people
6Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
100GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A postgres extension to avoid accidental mistakes

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year6 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2024-01-09 03:06:21 UTC to 2026-09-26 09:30:04 UTC.

012342024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 2 submissions, 0 comments20242025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20252026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 3 submissions, 1 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC220
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC431

What Hacker News says

6 sources
Author here: Adding some context. I led the Postgres platform team (2019-23) at Cloudflare and we were supporting 170+ growing product teams. One of the constant asks is schema migration review. We published a lot of best practices, added CI checks however, it was still hard to catch. Also, I tried to explain the internals of how the locking (rewrite) works, but I realized most of the devs just want the answer - Is it safe or not safe to run? Not sure if it rings a bell, the name is a reference to the Silicon Valley Jian Yang's hot dog or not hot dog app. Also, I understand the decision of safe vs not-safe depends heavily on data/histogram and edge cases, but still quite a lot of low-hanging issues can be easily caught with a deterministic rule engine. So I ported pg_savior[1] and used sql parser from libpg-query-node[2] which compiles as
Read the rest
WASM, so it entirely runs on the browser. No telemetry, no login. Source attached [3] [1] https://github.com/viggy28/pg_savior [2] https://github.com/constructive-io/libpg-query-node [3] https://github.com/viggy28/safe-not-safe
In Is your Postgres migration safe or not safe?

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.