HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
vitejs
vite
TypeScript2020–2026
vitejs / vite

vite

Next generation frontend tooling. It's fast!

31Distinct people
34Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
83.9KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Next generation frontend tooling. It's fast!

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 6:36:16 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year34 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2020-05-07 18:43:13 UTC to 2026-07-02 23:32:34 UTC.

0510152020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 14 mentions; 5 submissions, 9 comments20202021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 1 submissions, 4 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 8 mentions; 1 submissions, 7 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments20232024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 1 submissions, 4 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC1459
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC514
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC817
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC514

What Hacker News says

5 sources
For a beginner, I wouldn't recommend vite just yet. There are still rough edges (like browser load time being unbearably slow): https://github.com/vitejs/vite/issues/3208 If you're starting out, I'd suggest spending more of your time in a higher level of the stack (like writing application code, learning React/etc), rather than spending time deeper down in the plumbing, especially if you're using cutting-edge pieces in the build pipeline.
In Parcel 2 Beta 3 – improved build performance
I literally just spent days trying out Vite and comparing it to Webpack 5, and I can comfortably say that they are in two very distinct leagues. It isn't fair to compare Vite to a CRA build with Webpack. You can greatly improve Webpack's performance by: * Making sure `mode` is set to "development" (don't specify it all if in doubt) * Ditching babel-loader and using esbuild-loader instead * Adjusting build targets and making sure polyfills are not added in development * Making sure you don't import the entirety of libraries like Lodash and MomentJS (prefer date-fns) * [FUTURE] We'll soon be able to tell Webpack to output ES modules just like Vite [1] Vite still has many problems: * It just isn't suitable for proper server-side rendering, we'd need access to chunk names at build time * It has a weird mix of own and Rollup config settings th
Read the rest
at seems somewhat unpredictable * Many open issues regarding module imports, for ex, when a CJS module imports an ES one [2] Our current bottleneck with Webpack is actually sass-loader, taking at least 70% of the time during a fresh build, and we'd have the same problem with Vite. Something else that is worth pointing out is the ecosystem: Webpack's community has built tons of plugins for basically any use case you can imagine, and version 5 supports module federation, persistent caching, externals (very handy when doing SSR), customizable filename generators, performance hints, etc etc. Totally different game. Try to keep your build config simple, avoid too many loaders, plugins, and you should be fine 99% of the time. If you hit a wall, install speed-measure-webpack-plugin to get some help. [1] https://github.com/webpack/webpack/issues/2933 [2] https://github.com/vitejs/vite/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen...
In Why we switched from Webpack to Vite
Not exactly apples to apples, but I'd like to plug in Vite: https://github.com/vitejs/vite Not that it makes fast minification (which I don't care that much about, I minify only on deploy, and it's a small % of the time it takes), but it does allow for a very fast workflow in dev mode: auto reload seems almost instant even with heavy transpiling. I only mention it because I assume people look at this articles and think about their dev process speed as well. If you haven't, give it a try: it's from the Vue author, so it's really clean, but works with react as well.
In JavaScript Minification Benchmarks

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.