HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
VundleVim
Vundle.vim
Vim Script2011–2023
VundleVim / Vundle.vim

Vundle.vim

Vundle, the plug-in manager for Vim

39Distinct people
40Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
23.9KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Vundle, the plug-in manager for Vim

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 12:54:37 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year40 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2011-04-20 19:01:30 UTC to 2023-02-27 19:44:28 UTC.

0369122011-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 1 submissions, 3 comments20112012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 7 mentions; 1 submissions, 6 comments2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 12 mentions; 0 submissions, 12 comments2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 0 submissions, 5 comments2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 0 submissions, 4 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments20172018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 4 submissions, 1 comments2023

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20112011-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC413
20122012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC716
20132013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC12012
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC505
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC404
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC541

What Hacker News says

40 sources

Tell HN: Publicly editable GitHub wikis can be abused to distribute malware

It's only a matter of time until someone abuses a publicly editable wiki. For example, as someone noticed on Reddit[1], a link to Git for Windows on Vundle's wiki was replaced with a link to malware: https://github.com/VundleVim/Vundle.vim/wiki/Vundle-for-Windows/_compare/3aeb22ac39229af4312f2be1052ead184dd5b54d...aa3d293dd18ae1cb4f049c43b73b951651515863 In fact, most of the recent edits (made by many different accounts) were malicious: https://github.com/VundleVim/Vundle.vim/wiki/Vundle-for-Windows/_history I recommend restricting editing in your GitHub wikis to collaborators only. [1] - https://www.reddit.com/r/vim/comments/zzcn10/vimorg_autosave_vundle_plugin_windows…
1 points · Open discussion
Reminds me of vim plugin managers like Vundle or NeoBundle. The way they work is you specify a package name and it uses a heuristic to figure out where to look. To steal from the Vundle README... https://github.com/VundleVim/Vundle.vim " The following are examples of different formats supported. " Keep Plugin commands between vundle#begin/end. " plugin on GitHub repo Plugin 'tpope/vim-fugitive' " plugin from http://vim-scripts.org/vim/scripts.html Plugin 'L9' " Git plugin not hosted on GitHub Plugin 'git://git.wincent.com/command-t.git' " git repos on your local machine (i.e. when working on your own plugin) Plugin 'file:///home/gmarik/path/to/plugin' " The sparkup vim script is in a subdirectory of this repo called vim. " Pass the path to set the runtimepath properly. Plugin 'rstacruz/s
Read the rest
parkup', {'rtp': 'vim/'} " Avoid a name conflict with L9 Plugin 'user/L9', {'name': 'newL9'} It's one of those things that works so well you can just kind of forget about it once you get used to it, but you're not really locked in either.
In Crom – A package manager without the package registry
I might as well chime in too. I thought this was a fun way to get the motor-memory down for movement: http://vim-adventures.com/ And although I agree with the post you made, that everyone should know how the .vimrc file works, I use Vundle to help make my vim experience less painful: https://github.com/gmarik/Vundle.vim My biggest complaint about vim is probably a common one: the key commands don't seem to have much rhyme or reason. Perhaps in Bill Joy's mind they did but even now after years of use I find myself always having my vim cheat sheet nearby.
In Vim FAQ
I think your experience hits on a problem with vim distributions - you're jumping into a solution to someone else's pain points. spf13, which has a lot of great plugins, probably started as someone's personal collection of plugins at some point. As such, the author had a lot of time to muse on what her/his current vim set up was missing. Sharing someone else's vim distribution, you miss out on the motivation behind including things (and also on the opportunity to pick alternatives more suited to your needs). I would start with stock vim and spend a few minutes outlining the features you need. I recommend, as a minimal set, a couple of plugins I think most people are happy about: Vundle [or Pathogen] (two managers for vim plugins hosted on GitHub) https://github.com/gmarik/Vundle.vim [https://github.com/tpope/vim-pathogen] Sensible
Read the rest
vim (useful defaults for vim) https://github.com/tpope/vim-sensible Fugitive (make vim aware of your local git repository) https://github.com/tpope/vim-fugitive
In Ask HN: A better Vim distribution?

Showing the 15 most recent of 40 sources. Enable JavaScript to search and browse every indexed mention.

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.