HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
vvondra
bitwarden-serverless
JavaScript2018–2018
vvondra / bitwarden-serverless · Archived

bitwarden-serverless

[Abandoned] Implementation of the Bitwarden API using an AWS serverless stack

3Distinct people
4Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
257GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

[Abandoned] Implementation of the Bitwarden API using an AWS serverless stack

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by month4 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2018-01-09 21:17:57 UTC to 2018-09-30 15:51:07 UTC.

0122018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsJan 20182018-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsMay 20182018-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2018-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsSep 2018

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jan 20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-02-01 00:00:00 UTC110
Feb 20182018-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-03-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 20182018-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-04-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 20182018-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-05-01 00:00:00 UTC000
May 20182018-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-06-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 20182018-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-07-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 20182018-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-08-01 00:00:00 UTC202
Aug 20182018-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-09-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 20182018-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-10-01 00:00:00 UTC110

What Hacker News says

4 sources

Ask HN: How to assess security risk of running open-source API for BitWarden

Hello everyone. I'd like to get some well-informed opinions about how to assess risk for using an open-source implementation (https://github.com/vvondra/bitwarden-serverless/) of the BitWarden API. What I like about this implementation is that it all runs in the cloud, under the free tier. It looks like it was designed to take advantage of cloud resources. I scanned it with SonarCloud, and it comes up green. I'm currently working on scanning it with OWASP Dependency-Checker. For now, I'm not able to get that scanner to work. Thinking pessimistically, I figured there could still be a chance that there is something malicious buried in the code somewhere that the scanners wouldn't pick up, so I intended on reading through the code, line-by-line, though I am unfamiliar with NodeJS, at this time. The code looks like it's not BitWarden's code a
Read the rest
t all, and that it's far fewer lines than it looks like Bitwarden wrote to implement its core. What I like about BitWarden is that they appear to be pretty security-minded: https://github.com/bitwarden/web/blob/master/SECURITY.md. They even have a program on HackerOne to identify and fix exploits. I'd rather not use the infrastructure that they host in Azure. I'd rather have an unknown, private URL that is still in the cloud that I use to manage my credentials through. That's where this server-less implementation comes in. I figure that I'm taking on the risk of using an unknown implementation. But I also figure that some of the risk is mitigated by running in AWS and by using AWS architecture. I think that all that is really left for me to do is to read through the code and make sure that no back-door calls are being made in it. Does anyone have anything to add? I'm not interested in other options, at this time, just in assessing the risk of using this server-less implementation.
1 points · Open discussion

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.