HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
w3c
csswg-drafts
Bikeshed2016–2026
w3c / csswg-drafts

csswg-drafts

CSS Working Group Editor Drafts

87Distinct people
121Mentions
3Explicit recommenders
4.9KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

CSS Working Group Editor Drafts

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

Huh (having scanned but not read in detail the post), interesting approach. I'm not that well-versed in this area (as a game developer, I tend to jump straight to…

jan_Inkepa used a recommendation phrase. 3 indexed comments match. This is a phrase match, not a verdict.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 2:59:53 AM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year121 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2016-09-21 13:16:42 UTC to 2026-10-08 18:33:14 UTC.

051015202016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments20162017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 8 mentions; 2 submissions, 6 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 6 mentions; 2 submissions, 4 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 8 mentions; 1 submissions, 7 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 13 mentions; 3 submissions, 10 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 10 mentions; 1 submissions, 9 comments20212022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 19 mentions; 3 submissions, 16 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 20 mentions; 3 submissions, 17 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 10 mentions; 0 submissions, 10 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 15 mentions; 0 submissions, 15 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 11 mentions; 2 submissions, 9 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC826
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC624
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC817
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC13310
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC1019
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC19316
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC20317
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC10010
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC15015
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC1129

From the project README

An excerpt from the repository, fetched Nov 13, 2026.

Read the project’s introduction
Types of Workflows workflows/build-specs.yml - builds the entire repository of Editor's Drafts, along with a summary page. Also builds any .issues Issues-List files, and Markdown files. Deploys all the results to the repo's gh-pages workflows/SPEC-NAME-1.yml - each of these auto-publish one spec in the repo. Do not modify them by hand; they are auto-generated by generate-auto-publish-workflows.py and auto-publish-template.yml. Instead, update and run this .py file and commit the results.
Read the full README on GitHub

What Hacker News says

6 sources
Some of Chrome's decisions are definitely IE-like. For example, the FF team felt that flex/grid should become the new layout standard, and deprecated or accidental behaviors of the past could be sunset by doing it right on Flex/Grid. So, for example, margin-top: 10% would be percent of height instead of percent of width when on a flexbox or grid item.[1] Chrome did it their way and wouldn't discuss the issue, and eventually FF caved because Chrome has a near-monopoly. This idea of implementing bad design and forcing it on the world, won't end well for the user. Not to mention the whole recent hullaboo about hiding the www / m / whatever prefixes. [1] https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2085 [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17927972
In Am I logged in or not? GDPR case study on the example of Chrome browser change

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.