HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
w3c
csswg-drafts
Bikeshed2016–2026
w3c / csswg-drafts

csswg-drafts

CSS Working Group Editor Drafts

87Distinct people
121Mentions
3Explicit recommenders
4.9KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

CSS Working Group Editor Drafts

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

Huh (having scanned but not read in detail the post), interesting approach. I'm not that well-versed in this area (as a game developer, I tend to jump straight to…

jan_Inkepa used a recommendation phrase. 3 indexed comments match. This is a phrase match, not a verdict.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 9:28:18 AM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year121 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2016-09-21 13:16:42 UTC to 2026-10-08 18:33:14 UTC.

051015202016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments20162017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 8 mentions; 2 submissions, 6 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 6 mentions; 2 submissions, 4 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 8 mentions; 1 submissions, 7 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 13 mentions; 3 submissions, 10 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 10 mentions; 1 submissions, 9 comments20212022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 19 mentions; 3 submissions, 16 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 20 mentions; 3 submissions, 17 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 10 mentions; 0 submissions, 10 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 15 mentions; 0 submissions, 15 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 11 mentions; 2 submissions, 9 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC826
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC624
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC817
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC13310
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC1019
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC19316
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC20317
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC10010
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC15015
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC1129

From the project README

An excerpt from the repository, fetched Nov 13, 2026.

Read the project’s introduction
Types of Workflows workflows/build-specs.yml - builds the entire repository of Editor's Drafts, along with a summary page. Also builds any .issues Issues-List files, and Markdown files. Deploys all the results to the repo's gh-pages workflows/SPEC-NAME-1.yml - each of these auto-publish one spec in the repo. Do not modify them by hand; they are auto-generated by generate-auto-publish-workflows.py and auto-publish-template.yml. Instead, update and run this .py file and commit the results.
Read the full README on GitHub

What Hacker News says

13 sources
> Firefox supports pure css masonry grid behind a flag. That has less support than Bieber at a black metal festival though. Here's[1] the columns (or flexbox) way of doing it. Note that images will be a bit strangely ordered (as you would read columns). That's not solvable without JS (AFAIK). That's why W3C/CSSWG is looking at possible solutions[2] that resulted in the Firefox experiment you're referencing. [1] https://css-tricks.com/piecing-together-approaches-for-a-css... [2] https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4650
In Show HN: A simple way to make HTML websites
runarberg·Jul 17, 2020Recommendation phrase
I recommend taking the State of CSS[1] survey, it is a nice way of keeping up with the latest features. Other then that I use PostCSS with the postcss-preset-env[2] plugin. There you can enable various future features of the language and have it compile down to a more supported version. If your really want to dive into the future of CSS you can read the issue board for the CSSWG[3] (beware, it can suck hours out of your days). Smashing Magazine[4] and A List Apart[5] also sometimes have articles about a new(ish) or upcoming features. But the CSS community could really benefit from the spec maintainers having more active bloggers among them (e.g. like Rachel Andrew[6]) and provide a regular update of the language like 2ality does for JavaScript[7]. 1: https://stateofcss.com/ 2: https://preset-env.cssdb.org/ 3: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-
Read the rest
In Things I wish I’d known about CSS
The problem is that CSS uses greedy line breaks. In theory, this should improve once browsers implement CSS Text Module Level 4, specifically the `pretty` value for the `text-wrap` property [1][2]. Until then, we're stuck with poor-quality typesetting, or JavaScript solutions [3]. [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/css-text-4/#text-wrap [2] https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/672 [3] https://github.com/robertknight/tex-linebreak
In Show HN: LaTeX.css – Make your website look like a LaTeX document
Centering in CSS is "solved" problem if your "worst" browser to support is IE11. Flexbox does the job there. However, there are still couple of common tasks that are pain/hard/impossible to do with just CSS. Recently I learned that after all this years you still need to use JS to get css animation for dynamic height ("height:auto") of elements. And there is no progress in fixing it at CSS standard level. It's just sad... https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/626 https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3508605/how-can-i-transi... https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3508605/how-can-i-transi...
In How to Center in CSS (2015)
Some people are saying “user styles let you do this”, but it’s not actually true: take a textarea, for example; if you set its background-color, the browser discards its regular textarea appearance (which might have a special border colour and style and radius) and leaves you with what’s actually specified. Expressed very approximately, adjusting various properties implies `appearance: none`. And you can’t get it back. `background-color: initial`? Nope, no native appearance. `appearance: textarea !important`? No go. `background-color: f(env(x))` (a stupid way of getting a runtime-invalid value due to a bad spec, see https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3792 for details)? Nada. You could provide your own styles for form elements, but you can’t use user styles to retain native form element styling.
In Updates to form controls and focus

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.