HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
weaveworks
weave
Go2014–2024
weaveworks / weave · Archived

weave

Simple, resilient multi-host containers networking and more.

13Distinct people
18Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
6.6KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Simple, resilient multi-host containers networking and more.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 9:02:44 AM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year18 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2014-09-09 12:38:21 UTC to 2024-02-08 10:00:15 UTC.

02462014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 1 submissions, 4 comments20142015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 6 mentions; 0 submissions, 6 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20192020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2024

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC514
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC211
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC606
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC211
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202

What Hacker News says

5 sources
Great work! I was exploring the distributed docker networking space yesterday for an open source project I'm working on (https://github.com/pnegahdar/sporedock) and the ones I have currently found are: Weave - https://github.com/zettio/weave Ambassadord - https://github.com/progrium/ambassadord Warmhole - https://github.com/vishvananda/wormhole QTunnel (not docker specific) - https://github.com/getqujing/qtunnel Flannel - https://github.com/coreos/flannel I'd love a comparison write up if you guys ever get to it.
In WeaveDNS – A distributed DNS service for a weave network
Pretty cool demonstration of Weave[1]. Is it correct to summarize Weave as "Hamachi for Docker containers"? For those that don't remember Hamachi, perhaps "VPN for Docker containers" is a more contemporary technical description. [1] https://github.com/zettio/weave EDIT: I know this was just a proof-of-concept, but I believe if one were to bring up a multi-datacenter Cassandra ring, you'll want to ensure your replication configuration is "NetworkTopologyStrategy" and not the default "SimpleStrategy" setting[2]. [2] http://www.datastax.com/documentation/cassandra/2.0/cassandr...
In Cassandra cluster that spans 3 different network domains with 2 shell commands
> complex tricks with the existing network stack To retain the essence of how weave operates, this would likely not just be complex but impossible, short of kernel hackery. > you would really only need to do processing at the beginning of a connection and for some ARP request Weave needs to look at every Ethernet packet. Well, the headers at least. It's a virtual Ethernet switch. It doesn't even really know about IP, let alone TCP streams. See https://github.com/zettio/weave#how-does-it-work
In Weave – The Docker Network
re benchmarks...publishing some is on the TODO list. See https://github.com/zettio/weave/issues/37. Informally, weave is pretty fast but it's not saturating Gbit Ethernet. As you say, capturing with pcap and handling packets in user space carries an appreciable overhead. We've got some issues filed to look at pcap alternatives and also generally aim to improve performance. re suitability for NoSQL clustering... depends on where the bottlenecks are; if you want to cluster for HA rather than scale, i.e. there aren't any real bottlenecks, then weave will work well. Same if you want to cluster because of CPU or memory bottlenecks. If, otoh, networking is the bottleneck then adding weave into the mix isn't going to improve matters.
In Weave – The Docker Network

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.