HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
WebAssembly
meetings
HTML2017–2026
WebAssembly / meetings

meetings

WebAssembly meetings (VC or in-person), agendas, and notes

ProductivityWeb Development
Explore on GitHubRead Hacker News discussions
18Distinct people
20Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
548GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

WebAssembly meetings (VC or in-person), agendas, and notes

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 8:03:49 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year20 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2017-07-28 12:05:23 UTC to 2026-01-22 13:13:17 UTC.

0123452017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 3 submissions, 1 comments20172018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments20212022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 0 submissions, 5 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC431
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC505
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

5 sources
CharlesW·Dec 8, 2022
> Whereas the later has only been around since 2015 and was created by a company that subsists off an agreement with a deviant online advertising company. Mozilla created a precursor technology, but I thought Wasm was developed via the W3C standards process from the start. From the notes of the first meeting, you can see attendees from Adobe, Apple, Arm, Autodesk, Google, Intel, Mozilla, Stanford, and more. https://github.com/WebAssembly/meetings/blob/main/main/2017/... Additionally, Wasm has been a W3C standard since 2019.
In Goodbye to the C++ Implementation of Zig
sitkack·Jul 25, 2022
I think SIMD was a distraction to our conversation, most code doesn't use it and in the future the length agnostic, flexible vectors; https://github.com/WebAssembly/flexible-vectors/blob/master/... are a better solution. They are a lot like RVV; https://github.com/riscv/riscv-v-spec, research around vector processing is why RISC-V exists in the first place! I was trying to find the smallest Rust Wasm interpreters I could find, I should have read the source first, I only really use wasmtime, but this one looks very interesting, zero deps, zero unsafe. 16.5kloc of Rust https://github.com/rhysd/wain The most complete wasm env for small devices is wasm3 20kloc of C https://github.com/wasm3/wasm3 I get what you are saying as to be so small that there isn't a place of bugs to hide. > “There are two ways of constructing a software design: One w
Read the rest
ay is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult.” CAR Hoare Even a 100 line program can't be guaranteed to be free of bugs. These programs need embedded tests to ensure that the layer below them is functioning as intended. They cannot and should not run open loop. Speaking of 300+ reimplementations, I am sure that RISC-V has already exceeded that. The smallest readable implementation is like 200 lines of code; https://github.com/BrunoLevy/learn-fpga/blob/master/FemtoRV/... I don't think Wasm suffers from the base extension issue you bring up. It will get larger, but 1.0 has the right algebraic properties to be useful forever. Wasm does require an environment, for archival purposes that environment should be written in Wasm, with api for instantiating more envs passed into the first env. There are two solutions to the Wasm generating and calling Wasm problem. First would be a trampoline, where one returns Wasm from the first Wasm program which is then re-instantiated by the outer env. The other would be to pass in the api to create new Wasm envs over existing memory buffers. See, https://copy.sh/v86/ MS-DOS, NES or C64 are useful for archival purposes because they are dead, frozen in time along with a large corpus of software. But there is a ton of complexity in implementing those systems with enough fidelity to run software. Lua, Typed Assembly; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typed_assembly_language and Sector Lisp; https://github.com/jart/sectorlisp seem to have the right minimalism and compactness for archival purposes. Maybe it is sectorlisp+rv32+wasm. If there are directions you would like Wasm to go, I really recommend attending the Wasm CG meetings. https://github.com/WebAssembly/meetings When it comes to an archival system, I'd like it to be able to run anything from an era, not just specially crafted binaries. I think Wasm meets that goal. https://gist.github.com/dabeaz/7d8838b54dba5006c58a40fc28da9...
In Take more screenshots
adrianfcole·May 17, 2022
There's a proposals repo [1] that tracks the status of features like GC. According to that, GC is phase 2, which is prototyping [2]. To get to the finish line, implementations including at least 2 browsers need to happen (this is a Web standard, so there's some browser bias in the process). It is not straight forward to see who and what are implementing a proposal, especially if not tracked in the roadmap [3]. Best advice I could give for now is to watch the proposal repo [4], or just wait. It may be a while on this one. [1]: https://github.com/WebAssembly/proposals [2]: https://github.com/WebAssembly/meetings/blob/main/process/ph... [3]: https://webassembly.org/roadmap/ [4]: https://github.com/WebAssembly/gc
In Wazero: The zero dependency WebAssembly runtime for Go developers
tlively·Apr 20, 2022
The simplest way to get involved is to start attending the biweekly standardization meetings. The agendas are organized here: https://github.com/WebAssembly/meetings To attend the meetings, first join the W3C WebAssembly Community Group here: https://www.w3.org/groups/cg/webassembly, then email the CG chairs at webassembly-cg-chair@chromium.org to ask for an invite. From there you'll get a sense of who folks are so you can pair names with faces when contributing to the various proposal discussions on the many proposal repos listed here: https://github.com/webassembly/proposals. To get a sense of how things are run and decided, read the process documents here: https://github.com/WebAssembly/meetings/tree/main/process. The TL;DR is that the community group and its subgroups decide everything by consensus via votes during the meetings.
In WebAssembly 2.0 First Working Draft
richdougherty·Apr 19, 2022
It looks like garbage collection is at the 'proposal' stage, one step before it would start to be implemented. "During this phase: "One or more implementations proceed on prototyping the feature to the point that a comprehensive set of tests can be added. "A test suite is added. These tests need not pass the reference interpreter at this point, but should pass on some implementation." https://github.com/WebAssembly/proposals https://github.com/WebAssembly/meetings/blob/main/process/ph... Here's the proposal: https://github.com/WebAssembly/gc And you can see it's being actively worked on: https://github.com/WebAssembly/gc/commits/main
In WebAssembly 2.0 First Working Draft

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.