HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
WebAssembly
multi-memory
WebAssembly2020–2025
WebAssembly / multi-memory · Archived

multi-memory

Multiple per-module memories for Wasm

11Distinct people
11Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
139GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Multiple per-module memories for Wasm

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 11:00:58 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year11 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2020-01-19 16:56:37 UTC to 2025-09-17 19:57:22 UTC.

01232020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments20202021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments20222023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2025

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202

What Hacker News says

3 sources
There are stray references to the concept of multiple address spaces (or 'memories') in the wasm spec at present, and I recall at one point you may have always been passing 'memory #0' to your load/store opcodes before it was dropped from 1.0. It looks like people are still working on that as the solution. https://github.com/WebAssembly/multi-memory > Add a memory index to all memory-related instructions. > Loads and stores have the memop field, in which we can allocate a bit indicating a memory index immediate in the binary format. > All other memory instruction already have a memory index immediate (which currently has to be 0).
In Accessing WebAssembly reference-typed arrays from C++
It's not segmented, so no... or rather, not yet. The wasm spec already accommodates to some extent the notion of multiple "memories" (i.e. distinct flat heaps), although it only allows for one in practice: https://webassembly.github.io/spec/core/syntax/modules.html#... And there's an active proposal to allow for multiple memories: https://github.com/WebAssembly/multi-memory/blob/main/propos... In an environment like that, you'd need full-fledged pointers to carry both the memory index and the offset; and then you might want a non-fat "pointer to same memory" alternative for perf. Might as well call them far and near.
In WebAssembly and C++

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.