HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
WebMBro
WebMConverter
C#2015–2015
WebMBro / WebMConverter

WebMConverter

WebM for bakas.

3Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
368GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

WebM for bakas.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:03:16 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2015-07-29 05:02:08 UTC to 2015-07-29 23:39:52 UTC.

012015-07-29 05:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-29 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJul 29, 05:002015-07-29 06:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-29 07:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-29 07:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-29 08:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-29 08:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-29 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-29 09:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-29 10:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2015-07-29 10:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-29 11:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-29 11:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-29 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-29 12:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-29 13:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-29 13:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-29 14:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-29 14:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-29 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJul 29, 14:002015-07-29 15:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-29 16:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-29 16:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-29 17:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-29 17:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-29 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-29 18:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-29 19:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-29 19:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-29 20:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-29 20:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-29 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-29 21:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-29 22:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-29 22:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-29 23:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-29 23:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-30 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJul 29, 23:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jul 29, 05:002015-07-29 05:00:00 UTC2015-07-29 06:00:00 UTC101
Jul 29, 06:002015-07-29 06:00:00 UTC2015-07-29 07:00:00 UTC000
Jul 29, 07:002015-07-29 07:00:00 UTC2015-07-29 08:00:00 UTC000
Jul 29, 08:002015-07-29 08:00:00 UTC2015-07-29 09:00:00 UTC000
Jul 29, 09:002015-07-29 09:00:00 UTC2015-07-29 10:00:00 UTC101
Jul 29, 10:002015-07-29 10:00:00 UTC2015-07-29 11:00:00 UTC000
Jul 29, 11:002015-07-29 11:00:00 UTC2015-07-29 12:00:00 UTC000
Jul 29, 12:002015-07-29 12:00:00 UTC2015-07-29 13:00:00 UTC000
Jul 29, 13:002015-07-29 13:00:00 UTC2015-07-29 14:00:00 UTC000
Jul 29, 14:002015-07-29 14:00:00 UTC2015-07-29 15:00:00 UTC000
Jul 29, 15:002015-07-29 15:00:00 UTC2015-07-29 16:00:00 UTC000
Jul 29, 16:002015-07-29 16:00:00 UTC2015-07-29 17:00:00 UTC000
Jul 29, 17:002015-07-29 17:00:00 UTC2015-07-29 18:00:00 UTC000
Jul 29, 18:002015-07-29 18:00:00 UTC2015-07-29 19:00:00 UTC000
Jul 29, 19:002015-07-29 19:00:00 UTC2015-07-29 20:00:00 UTC000
Jul 29, 20:002015-07-29 20:00:00 UTC2015-07-29 21:00:00 UTC000
Jul 29, 21:002015-07-29 21:00:00 UTC2015-07-29 22:00:00 UTC000
Jul 29, 22:002015-07-29 22:00:00 UTC2015-07-29 23:00:00 UTC000
Jul 29, 23:002015-07-29 23:00:00 UTC2015-07-30 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

3 sources
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9966118 tl;dr: Observed fact, GitHub disappeared a repo (this I personally know for a fact) and all its forks, the only reason we can surmise is that it described itself as "X for retards". I believe it's this one https://github.com/WebMBro/WebMConverter now described as "WebM for bakas." (Japanglish for idiots or fools). Per this https://imgur.com/QC51FZz it was indeed for the use of that word. I'd be more willing to extend some slack to GitHub if they hadn't precipitously turned off their service for these repos, that's worse than this example of their "tolerance", but who knows what it'll be next? Who knows how this will play out in the long term; their trashing of their meritocracy rug suggests this is not a one off (ADDED: and erics32 reminded me of C+=). Why should I or anyone else concerned ab
Read the rest
out long term stability invest in their particular value adds when they show such capriciousness? The great point, in relation to this topic of their latest investment, is that companies that depend almost entirely on their "communities" can screw those up and destroy their value.
In GitHub Raises $250M at $2B Valuation
There's something odd about this. The repo in question is 'nixxquality/WebMConverter' which is where the GitHub notice was sent. However, this is a fork of another repo - https://github.com/WebMBro/WebMConverter - and that parent repo seems alive and well (that is, not disabled, and unchanged, so still titled 'WebM for retards') so why the discrepancy? Did the WebMBro account get suspended initially, and then reinstated, and only the fork felt the need to change the text? If so, this seems like a lot of overreaction based on what may well have been a (well intentioned) mistake on GitHub's part?
In GitHub threatens to shut down a repository for using the word 'retard'

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.