HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
WickrInc
wickr-crypto-c
C2017–2022
WickrInc / wickr-crypto-c

wickr-crypto-c

An implementation of the Wickr Secure Messaging Protocol in C

6Distinct people
6Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
380GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

An implementation of the Wickr Secure Messaging Protocol in C

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year6 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2017-02-16 16:42:03 UTC to 2022-06-16 14:53:16 UTC.

0122017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments20172018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20192020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2022

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

6 sources
Very, I know people who work there, they open sourced their crypto engine [1]. They also struggle with people using WickrMe for bad stuff because of how little info they collect from users (no phone required, true e2ee encryption, and so on...) [2].Own by Amazon doesn't imply that have spyware embedded, unless you can prove, not defending Amazon by any means, there is plenty to criticize and condemn about them, I'm just stating facts. 1- https://github.com/WickrInc/wickr-crypto-c 2- https://www.cnbc.com/2022/06/10/wickr-amazons-encrypted-chat...
In Tell HN: Banned from LinkedIn for Reporting Wickr Drug Spam
Whilst not the same as mentioned in TFA, I noticed in Signal that if you allow it access to your contacts it will tell you how many of your contacts are already on Signal. I understand this is useful from a usability/discoverability aspect, but from a privacy perspective I have no reason to be made aware of the fact that one of my old bosses who's number is in my phone is on Signal and neither should they know that I am on Signal for the same reasons (or lack thereof). What's worse is there seems to be no way to opt-out of this behavior. I can deny Signal access to my contacts, thereby not knowing which of my contacts are on Signal, but that doesn't stop the other party from knowing if I am on Signal if they have given Signal access to their contacts. It's not farfetched to consider a world where an oppressive regime may outlaw the use of
Read the rest
something like Signal, Telegram or even WhatsApp and they'd be able to easily determine if you're using such a service through passive techniques such as these. As far as I know, Wickr is a bit more privacy focused, but it doesn't tick the open source box for me (although the supposed source code is published[1] for public review). [1] https://github.com/WickrInc/wickr-crypto-c
In A Telegram bug that disclose phone numbers of any users in public groups

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.