wireguard-android

Yeah this guys comment here is spot on: https://github.com/WireGuard/wireguard-android/pull/80#issue... I recently reviewed a PR that I suspect is AI generated. It added a function that doesn't appear to be called from anywhere. It's shit because AI is absolutely not on the level of a good developer yet. So it changes the expectation. If a PR is not AI generated then there is a reasonable expectation that a vaguely competent human has actually thought about it. If it's AI generated then the expectation is that they didn't really think about it at all and are just hoping the AI got it right (which it very often doesn't). It's rude because you're essentially pawning off work that the author should have done to the reviewer. Obviously not everyone dumps raw AI generated code straight into a PR, so I don't have any problem with using AI in ge

Voila: https://github.com/WireGuard/wireguard-android/pull/82 https://github.com/WireGuard/wireguard-android/pull/80 In that first one, the double pasted AI retort in the last comment is pretty wild. In both of these, look at the actual "files changed" tab for the wtf.