HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
wisp-lang
wisp
wisp2012–2023
wisp-lang / wisp

wisp

A little Clojure-like LISP in JavaScript

Web DevelopmentLanguages & Compilers
Explore on GitHubRead Hacker News discussions
16Distinct people
23Mentions
1Explicit recommenders
986GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A little Clojure-like LISP in JavaScript

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

Another datapoint - wisp, my favorite LISP-to-JS transpiler, also apparently works fine: https://github.com/wisp-lang/wisp/issues/174 This makes for a pretty awesome…

rcarmo used a recommendation phrase. One indexed comment matches. This is a phrase match, not a verdict.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 8:59:20 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year23 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2012-10-10 12:39:18 UTC to 2023-09-08 21:22:40 UTC.

02462012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments20122013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 6 mentions; 0 submissions, 6 comments2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 1 submissions, 4 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20172018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2023

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20122012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20132013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC606
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC514
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC211
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202

What Hacker News says

6 sources
rcarmo·Oct 30, 2014
Personally, I find https://github.com/Gozala/wisp to be a whole lot more coherent and readable (and probably more mature, too, even though it has much less documentation). wisp also generates very nice JS code (and source maps), and my only real problem with it is that it lacks the time and resources ClojureScript clearly commands at this point. (edited to add: wisp also has a fair amount of activity: https://gitter.im/Gozala/wisp)
In Jisp – A programmable language that compiles to JavaScript
mkremins·Jun 13, 2014
> The thing is, Closer was created for use on CodeCombat, which expects the parse tree to be in the standard Mozilla AST format. As far as I know, none of the projects you mention satisfy this requirement. I don't know anything about Outlet, but the Wisp compiler actually makes use of Escodegen [1] – which expects input to be provided in the Mozilla AST format – to generate JavaScript. You can peek at writer.wisp [2] in the compiler codebase to see how it's done. [1] https://github.com/Constellation/escodegen [2] https://github.com/Gozala/wisp/blob/master/src/backend/escod...
In Show HN: Clojure parser and core library in JavaScript, live on CodeCombat
woah·Mar 5, 2014
I would agree. If you have a hard time learning HAML, something is wrong. I learned it very early in my career, and it was once of the first things that really accelerated my work. I'm not, and have never been, a rails dev. Coffee is a bit different (IMO) because it changes the way the language works, instead of being a 1-1 conversion like HAML. I personally don't like it, it just seems like a big bag of syntax sugar tricks thrown together. If I'm going to learn a js preprocessor language, it will be something with a cohesive design as a language (like Clojure or Wisp https://github.com/Gozala/wisp) instead of Coffee's grab bag of gee whiz.
In No more Haml or CoffeeScript

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.