HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
wordpress-mobile
WordPress-Editor-iOS
JavaScript2016–2016
wordpress-mobile / WordPress-Editor-iOS · Archived

WordPress-Editor-iOS

⛔️ [DEPRECATED] A reusable iOS rich text editor component.

Developer ToolsMobile & Desktop
Explore on GitHubRead Hacker News discussions
7Distinct people
7Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
1.1KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

⛔️ [DEPRECATED] A reusable iOS rich text editor component.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 7:02:50 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour7 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2016-10-29 20:32:39 UTC to 2016-10-30 19:20:45 UTC.

0122016-10-29 20:00:00 UTC to 2016-10-29 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsOct 29, 20:002016-10-29 21:00:00 UTC to 2016-10-29 22:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-10-29 22:00:00 UTC to 2016-10-29 23:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2016-10-29 23:00:00 UTC to 2016-10-30 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-10-30 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-10-30 01:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-10-30 01:00:00 UTC to 2016-10-30 02:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-10-30 02:00:00 UTC to 2016-10-30 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-10-30 03:00:00 UTC to 2016-10-30 04:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2016-10-30 04:00:00 UTC to 2016-10-30 05:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-10-30 05:00:00 UTC to 2016-10-30 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-10-30 06:00:00 UTC to 2016-10-30 07:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2016-10-30 07:00:00 UTC to 2016-10-30 08:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsOct 30, 07:002016-10-30 08:00:00 UTC to 2016-10-30 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-10-30 09:00:00 UTC to 2016-10-30 10:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-10-30 10:00:00 UTC to 2016-10-30 11:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-10-30 11:00:00 UTC to 2016-10-30 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-10-30 12:00:00 UTC to 2016-10-30 13:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-10-30 13:00:00 UTC to 2016-10-30 14:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-10-30 14:00:00 UTC to 2016-10-30 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-10-30 15:00:00 UTC to 2016-10-30 16:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-10-30 16:00:00 UTC to 2016-10-30 17:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-10-30 17:00:00 UTC to 2016-10-30 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-10-30 18:00:00 UTC to 2016-10-30 19:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-10-30 19:00:00 UTC to 2016-10-30 20:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsOct 30, 19:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Oct 29, 20:002016-10-29 20:00:00 UTC2016-10-29 21:00:00 UTC101
Oct 29, 21:002016-10-29 21:00:00 UTC2016-10-29 22:00:00 UTC000
Oct 29, 22:002016-10-29 22:00:00 UTC2016-10-29 23:00:00 UTC202
Oct 29, 23:002016-10-29 23:00:00 UTC2016-10-30 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 30, 00:002016-10-30 00:00:00 UTC2016-10-30 01:00:00 UTC000
Oct 30, 01:002016-10-30 01:00:00 UTC2016-10-30 02:00:00 UTC000
Oct 30, 02:002016-10-30 02:00:00 UTC2016-10-30 03:00:00 UTC000
Oct 30, 03:002016-10-30 03:00:00 UTC2016-10-30 04:00:00 UTC101
Oct 30, 04:002016-10-30 04:00:00 UTC2016-10-30 05:00:00 UTC000
Oct 30, 05:002016-10-30 05:00:00 UTC2016-10-30 06:00:00 UTC000
Oct 30, 06:002016-10-30 06:00:00 UTC2016-10-30 07:00:00 UTC202
Oct 30, 07:002016-10-30 07:00:00 UTC2016-10-30 08:00:00 UTC000
Oct 30, 08:002016-10-30 08:00:00 UTC2016-10-30 09:00:00 UTC000
Oct 30, 09:002016-10-30 09:00:00 UTC2016-10-30 10:00:00 UTC000
Oct 30, 10:002016-10-30 10:00:00 UTC2016-10-30 11:00:00 UTC000
Oct 30, 11:002016-10-30 11:00:00 UTC2016-10-30 12:00:00 UTC000
Oct 30, 12:002016-10-30 12:00:00 UTC2016-10-30 13:00:00 UTC000
Oct 30, 13:002016-10-30 13:00:00 UTC2016-10-30 14:00:00 UTC000
Oct 30, 14:002016-10-30 14:00:00 UTC2016-10-30 15:00:00 UTC000
Oct 30, 15:002016-10-30 15:00:00 UTC2016-10-30 16:00:00 UTC000
Oct 30, 16:002016-10-30 16:00:00 UTC2016-10-30 17:00:00 UTC000
Oct 30, 17:002016-10-30 17:00:00 UTC2016-10-30 18:00:00 UTC000
Oct 30, 18:002016-10-30 18:00:00 UTC2016-10-30 19:00:00 UTC000
Oct 30, 19:002016-10-30 19:00:00 UTC2016-10-30 20:00:00 UTC110

What Hacker News says

1 sources
velmu·Oct 30, 2016Submission

Beyond GPL compliance, the Wix/WordPress brawl ridiculous

The WordPress project lead Matt Mullenweg and the Wix company have been duking it it out on the GPL licensing of Wix's iOS application. It's now clear that Wix needs to release the source for the app - and they've said they will. What makes this peculiar is that according to Mullenweg they're stealing WordPress created code in it's whole. But if you look at the disputed iOS editor component (https://github.com/wordpress-mobile/WordPress-Editor-iOS), it's largely a derivative work. Automattic has taken five permissive licensed (BSD, MIT) libraries and built their component with those and are trying to take credit for creating it all largely. On the code page they've got attributions, because they have to. In the rage posts of Mullenweg there is no reference to these. Only the WordPress community and their doings. The feeling that WordPress
Read the rest
is successful despite of Matt Mullenweg only grows stronger.
2 points · Open discussion

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.