xserver

> that is what the X developers did with Wayland This is rather incomplete. For instance, gtk devs already threw out tons of old code in GTK4. Wayland also has fewer features than xorg; and there are also fewer choices available. I noticed this with regards to WMs/DEs. I am not even going to issues wayland has with regards to certain video graphics - that's another not mentioned issue here. You are trying to pick individual cherries. > This sort of thing is why to fix X11 security you have to give up backwards compatibility and create a new X version. I don't think so: https://github.com/X11Libre/xserver Let's have a look in a little while. I myself hope for better and more transparent information at all times. Probably others want better security overall. Would it not be somewhat interesting if wayland were to be abandoned eventually due

I don't think it is "just around" - it is actively maintained still: https://github.com/X11Libre/xserver In the end Red Hat failed to kill off X11. Let's see what happens next. The GTK devs already rejected patches for maintaining the toolkit further for the xorg platform, following their "GTK5 will no longer support x11" agenda. Would be kind of great to have a universal GUI toolkit that would work rather than have toolkits controlled de-facto by private companies who just willy-nilly throw out support for this or that platform at their own selfish discretion. Though, someone else now helps maintain gtk2, though most of the patches are in regards to fixing bugs, ensuring that it can be compiled and so forth. https://git.devuan.org/Daemonratte/gtk2-ng

Xlibre (the only current actively developed implementation of a X11 server) has a new extension - XNamespace to address some challenges as well. https://github.com/X11Libre/xserver/blob/master/doc/Xnamespa...

No idea about the overall background of the project or devs, but: https://github.com/X11Libre/xserver/blob/master/CoC.md In my understanding a good chunk of the CoC dislike connects to MAGA ideology (because CoC aim at inclusivity, and we know what the MAGA position on that is). (the standard approach to thinking a CoC is useless is probably just to not have one and not comment on it. Going out of one's way to make a statement shows something that goes further than "maybe it's useless")